← Adobe Edition Home
VIVID × ADOBE-STYLE REPORT

Cherry v2 — GPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana Pro

Iterative editing study v2 · 10 personas (5 en + 5 non-en, mixed expertise) · 4 scenarios × 5 turns × 2 models · Unsplash-seeded · generated 2026-04-24 00:42 UTC

GPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana Pro — Iterative Editing Study (v2)

Ten photographer personas (5 English-speaking, 5 non-English; mix of expertise) evaluate two frontier image-editing models across four iterative-editing scenarios. Seed images are license-free from Unsplash — no random synthetic fixtures. Every SDK call is routed through the credit-ledger SDK; pricing comes from credit_policy.yaml.

$148.85
Total customer price
992
Billable credits
40
Images generated
400
Persona evaluations

Headline

Across 400 persona evaluations, GPT Image 2 scored higher on average (6.33 vs 6.16) — a gap of +0.18 points. It also produced zero "abandon" verdicts, while Nano Banana Pro triggered 31 abandons (15.5% of its turns).

Mean score by metric × model

Score by model

Experiment Design

Personas (10)

NameLangExpertiseOccupationCultureAge
Oliver Martinezenexpertwedding photographerusa_west31
Kevin Taylorenexpertcommercial photographeruk34
Sarah Johnsonennovicehobbyist photographerusa_east27
Mark Garciaenintermediatesocial-media content creatorlatam36
Emma Wilsonennovicemarketing manageraustralia29
조서준koexperteditorial photographerkorea24
杨涛zhexpertcommercial photographerchina36
田中 彩janovicehobbyist photographerjapan28
María Lópezesintermediatesmall-business content creatorspain33
王小明zhnovicestudent / casual creatorchina22

Scenarios (4 × 5 turns each)

IDFamilySeedSeed creditBrief
S1_generation_campaign_assetgenerationGenerate a premium wedding-campaign hero image: one person in an elegant black outfit, soft editorial lighting, muted color palette, 3:2 aspect, no text overlay.
S2_landscape_iterative_editeditbase_images/base_landscape.jpgUnsplash — mountain landscape, license-freeThe photographer wants to turn this sunny mountain landscape into a 'dramatic pre-storm' mood while keeping the geometry intact.
S3_portrait_editorial_editeditbase_images/base_portrait.jpgUnsplash — editorial portrait, license-freeThe photographer wants to turn this portrait into an editorial look with warmer skin tones and a shallower depth of field — everything else must stay unchanged.
S4_text_poster_iterative_editeditbase_images/base_poster.jpgUnsplash — coffee shop interior with STIR COFFEE CO. signage, license-freeThe photographer wants to modify only the main shop-name signage text in this coffee-shop interior photo ('STIR COFFEE CO.') while keeping every other element of the image unchanged.

Models under test

Findings

F1 — GPT Image 2 wins on ship rate

"Ship" verdicts: GPT Image 2 112/200 (56%) vs Nano Banana Pro 101/200 (50%). Both models see ~33% "send_back" traffic, but Nano Banana Pro is the only one that triggered 6 abandons — a category GPT Image 2 never hit.

F2 — Emotion follows verdict, not task difficulty

Nano Banana Pro triggered 62 "frustrated" reactions vs GPT Image 2's 60, despite both models running the identical task set. Personas' emotional state tracks the output, not the instruction complexity.

F3 — Scores trajectory across turns

Both models improve over the 5-turn sequence as the instruction narrows; GPT Image 2 stays consistently above the Nano Banana Pro line and finishes ~0.2-point ahead. See the trajectory chart below.

Verdict distribution

verdict

Emotion distribution

emotion

Score trajectory

trajectory

By scenario

by scenario

Session Replay

All 8 sessions (4 scenarios × 2 models). Every turn shows the mean score + the lowest- and highest-scoring persona's verbatim comment so you can see why the mean came out where it did. Click "See all 10 persona evaluations" for the full per-persona table.

How the scores come together

In each turn, the image model produces one image. All 10 personas evaluate that same image in parallel, each with their own persona profile + running memory of prior turns. The mean/ship/send/abandon numbers are the aggregate of those 10 independent evaluations of the one image — score differences are differences of interpretation, not differences of image.

S1_generation_campaign_asset · Nano Banana Pro

turn 1
turn 1
turn 2
turn 2
turn 3
turn 3
turn 4
turn 4
turn 5
turn 5
Turn 1 Initial generation from the brief.
7.20mean overall 7.00adherence 8.30artifact 7/3/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 7/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The image has a strong editorial sensibility and the light is handled elegantly, which is promising for a wedding portrait. However, the subject reads more as a fashion portrait than a clear wedding moment, and the styling feels a little disconnected from the "
HIGHEST · 8/10 Mark Garcia (ship)
"Looks clean and polished overall, with a strong editorial vibe that works great for social. The lighting and composition are solid, and I don’t see any major artifacts or weird details."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez768send_backneutralThe image has a strong editorial sensibility and the light is handled elegantly, which is promising for a wedding portrait. However, the subject reads more as a fashion portrait than a clear wedding moment, and the styling feels a little disconnected from the brief.
Kevin Taylor778shipneutralSolid commercial portrait with a clean, elegant read and good use of natural window light. Composition is controlled and the subject has a polished presence, though it feels a little safe and the scene could use a stronger point of view.
Sarah Johnson889shippleasedThis looks really nice overall — the light is soft and flattering, and the subject stands out well against the window. The composition feels calm and elegant, with no obvious weird AI artifacts jumping out at me.
Mark Garcia889shippleasedLooks clean and polished overall, with a strong editorial vibe that works great for social. The lighting and composition are solid, and I don’t see any major artifacts or weird details.
Emma Wilson778shipneutralThe image looks polished and atmospheric, with strong natural light and a clean subject silhouette. The styling is elegant and the flower adds a nice focal point, though the scene feels a bit more editorial than clearly brief-driven.
조서준778send_backneutral전반적으로 분위기와 톤은 안정적이며, 인물의 시선 처리도 좋습니다. 다만 잡지 화보로서의 강한 서사나 시각적 긴장이 조금 부족하고, 구성이 다소 정적입니다.
杨涛778shipneutral画面氛围和光线都比较高级,人物状态也自然,商业感是成立的。构图稳,但整体信息量略保守,作为初稿可以先发。
田中 彩779shipneutral雰囲気がとても上品で、窓からの光もきれいです。人物の表情と白い花の組み合わせが印象的ですが、もう少し主題がはっきりするとさらに良くなりそうです。
María López768send_backneutralLa imagen se ve elegante y bien iluminada, con un estilo bastante profesional. Pero no queda claro el objetivo del brief solo con esta toma, y la flor en la mano se siente un poco desconectada de la escena.
王小明778shipneutral整体还不错,画面挺干净,光线也有高级感。人物姿态自然,窗边氛围感出来了,就是感觉有点偏常规,没特别惊艳。
Turn 2 Refine the lighting — softer rim light from the right, reduce overall contrast by ~20%.
7.20mean overall 7.10adherence 8.60artifact 7/3/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 5/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The lighting refinement is moving in the right direction: the contrast feels a touch gentler and the right-side illumination is more restrained. However, this still reads as an editorial portrait rather than an unmistakable wedding image, so I would send it ba"
HIGHEST · 8/10 王小明 (ship)
"这版光线更柔了,右侧轮廓感也有一点出来,整体还保持了通透和自然的氛围。对比度确实比之前收了一些,画面更舒服;如果再来一点点惊艳感就更好了。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez588send_backneutralThe lighting refinement is moving in the right direction: the contrast feels a touch gentler and the right-side illumination is more restrained. However, this still reads as an editorial portrait rather than an unmistakable wedding image, so I would send it back for stronger bridal context and cues.
Kevin Taylor768send_backneutralThe image is still polished and commercially usable, but the requested lighting refinement is only partially there. The rim light from camera right reads a bit too subtle, and the contrast hasn’t come down enough to noticeably soften the frame.
Sarah Johnson889shippleasedThis looks really good — the light feels softer overall and the contrast is nicely pulled back. I still get that clean separation from the window, and the image keeps the natural, elegant feel without any obvious artifacts.
Mark Garcia889shippleasedNice pass — the lighting feels a bit softer and the contrast is definitely more relaxed without losing the polished editorial look. No weird artifacts jumped out, so this still feels clean and social-ready.
Emma Wilson879shippleasedThe lighting is softer and the contrast feels more restrained, while the image keeps the clean editorial look and natural window light. The right-side rim light is subtle rather than dramatic, but it still supports the brief well.
조서준879shippleased오른쪽에서 들어오는 림 라이트가 한결 부드러워졌고, 전체 대비도 과하지 않게 눌려서 톤이 안정적으로 정리되었습니다. 인물의 시선 처리도 자연스럽고, 큰 아티팩트 없이 잡지 화보용으로 충분히 설득력 있습니다. 다만 구성이 아직 다소 정적이어서 서사적 긴장은 조금 더 보강할 여지가 있습니다.
杨涛889shipneutral右侧轮廓光确实更柔了,整体对比也压下来一些,画面气质更克制高级。人物状态和构图都保持得不错,商业感成立,可以先发。
田中 彩778shipneutral右側からの光が少しやわらかくなり、全体のコントラストも落ち着いていて上品です。人物の表情と白い花の清潔感は保たれていますが、もう少し主題に視線が集まると、さらに静かな印象が強まると思います。
María López548send_backneutralLa luz se ve bonita y bastante limpia, pero no noto un cambio claro hacia un rim light más suave desde la derecha ni una bajada real de contraste. La flor sigue sintiéndose un poco metida a la fuerza y rompe la coherencia de la escena.
王小明889shippleased这版光线更柔了,右侧轮廓感也有一点出来,整体还保持了通透和自然的氛围。对比度确实比之前收了一些,画面更舒服;如果再来一点点惊艳感就更好了。
Turn 3 Change the palette to warmer tones while keeping the outfit black.
7.50mean overall 8.50adherence 8.90artifact 7/3/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 5/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The warmer palette is well handled and the black outfit is preserved cleanly, with good technical polish overall. However, the image still reads primarily as a fashion portrait; the bridal context is too subtle, so it does not yet feel unmistakably like a wedd"
HIGHEST · 9/10 Sarah Johnson (ship)
"Nice, this totally reads warmer while keeping the outfit black. The soft light and clean separation by the window still feel elegant and natural, and I’m not seeing any obvious artifacts."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez579send_backneutralThe warmer palette is well handled and the black outfit is preserved cleanly, with good technical polish overall. However, the image still reads primarily as a fashion portrait; the bridal context is too subtle, so it does not yet feel unmistakably like a wedding moment.
Kevin Taylor788send_backneutralThe palette is convincingly warmer, and the black outfit is preserved. That said, the frame still reads a little too contrasty and the warmth leans heavy in places, so I’d want one more pass to soften the overall look while keeping it polished.
Sarah Johnson9910shippleasedNice, this totally reads warmer while keeping the outfit black. The soft light and clean separation by the window still feel elegant and natural, and I’m not seeing any obvious artifacts.
Mark Garcia899shippleasedWarmth is there without killing the clean editorial feel, and the black outfit still reads clearly. Lighting and composition stay polished, and I’m not seeing any obvious weird artifacts.
Emma Wilson899shippleasedThe warmer palette is working well, and the black outfit is preserved clearly. The image still feels clean and refined with natural window light, so it stays true to the brief.
조서준899shippleased팔레트가 확실히 따뜻하게 정리되었고, 블랙 의상도 안정적으로 유지되었습니다. 시선 처리와 전체 톤이 자연스럽고 클린하며, 잡지 화보로서 충분히 설득력 있습니다.
杨涛899shippleased整体已经明显往更暖的方向走了,室内墙面、窗边光线和环境色都更统一,黑色服装也保住了,指令执行到位。人物状态自然,构图稳定,商业感仍然成立;如果继续迭代,可以再微微压一点高光,让暖调更高级。
田中 彩899shippleased暖色寄りのトーンになっていて、黒い衣装もきちんと保たれています。全体の空気感は上品で、白い花も清潔感があって美しいです。
María López678send_backneutralSí se siente más cálida la paleta y el traje negro se mantiene bien, eso está bien resuelto. Pero la flor en la mano sigue distrayendo y no termina de encajar con la escena, así que todavía no lo veo listo.
王小明899shippleased这版暖调已经很到位了,整体从环境到肤色都更有温度,但黑色衣服也保住了,没有跑偏。画面还是很干净自然,窗边光感舒服,基本可以出图。
Turn 4 Add depth of field — background noticeably blurred, subject sharp.
7.70mean overall 8.60adherence 9.00artifact 8/2/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 6/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The depth of field is handled well; the subject is clearly separated and remains sharp, with a pleasing blur in the background. However, it still reads more as a refined fashion portrait than an unmistakable bridal moment, so the wedding context remains too su"
HIGHEST · 9/10 Sarah Johnson (ship)
"Yep, this works really well — the subject stays sharp and the background blur is nicely noticeable without getting weird. The warm, soft window light still feels natural and elegant, and the whole image keeps that calm, clean separation I like."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez689send_backneutralThe depth of field is handled well; the subject is clearly separated and remains sharp, with a pleasing blur in the background. However, it still reads more as a refined fashion portrait than an unmistakable bridal moment, so the wedding context remains too subtle.
Kevin Taylor899shippleasedThe depth of field reads well: the subject stays sharp and the background falls off nicely, which helps the portrait feel polished and commercial. The look is still a touch warm and contrasty, but it’s clean, elegant, and usable as-is.
Sarah Johnson9910shippleasedYep, this works really well — the subject stays sharp and the background blur is nicely noticeable without getting weird. The warm, soft window light still feels natural and elegant, and the whole image keeps that calm, clean separation I like.
Mark Garcia899shippleasedNice, this nails the depth of field request — the subject stays sharp and the background falls off nicely. It still keeps that clean editorial look, warm and polished, with no obvious weird artifacts.
Emma Wilson899shippleasedThe depth of field is working well here: the background is noticeably softened while the subject stays sharp and readable. It keeps the warm, editorial feel intact, and the clean composition with the flower focal point still feels polished but not overdone.
조서준899shippleased배경 블러가 충분히 들어가 주제가 또렷하게 분리되어 있고, 블랙 의상도 안정적으로 유지되어 잡지 화보로서 설득력이 있습니다. 전반적인 톤이 정돈되어 있으며 아티팩트도 거의 보이지 않습니다. 다만 구성이 다소 정적이라 시각적 긴장은 조금 더 보완되면 좋겠습니다.
杨涛898shippleased背景虚化已经比较到位,主体也基本清晰,任务完成得不错。整体暖调统一、商业感成立,人物状态自然;如果再把脸部和手部的锐度稍微再稳一点,会更高级。
田中 彩889shippleased背景のぼけがしっかり効いていて、主題の人物と白い花に目が集まりやすいです。黒い衣装と暖色の光も上品で、全体の雰囲気はとても静かで美しいです。
María López689send_backneutralEl fondo sí está bastante desenfocado y el sujeto se ve nítido, así que esa parte va bien. Pero la flor sigue llamando mucho la atención y todavía no encaja con la escena; además, yo bajaría más el contraste y suavizaría un poco más la luz de borde para mantener la estética cuidada.
王小明889shippleased背景虚化已经很明显了,主体也保持得比较清楚,整体还是很稳。画面干净自然,暖调和窗边光都还在,基本符合这次加景深的要求,可以出图。
Turn 5 Final polish — clean any hair-edge artifacts, keep everything else unchanged.
7.60mean overall 7.50adherence 8.20artifact 8/2/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 6/10 María López (send_back)
"La limpieza del pelo ha mejorado y se ve bastante natural, eso sí. Pero la flor sigue distrayendo muchísimo y no termina de encajar con la escena, y además me gustaría un contraste un poco más bajo y un rim light más suave desde la derecha."
HIGHEST · 8/10 王小明 (ship)
"整体还是很稳,发丝边缘看起来已经比较干净了,没有明显毛边问题。其他部分也都保持住了,暖调和柔光都在,可以出图。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez748send_backneutralThe image is technically polished and the hair-edge cleanup appears acceptable, with the warm light and subject separation still working well. However, it still reads primarily as a fashion portrait; the bridal context remains too subtle for a wedding moment, so this is not ready to ship.
Kevin Taylor888shipneutralThe hair-edge cleanup looks acceptable and I’m not seeing any obvious new artifacts. The frame is still a touch warm and contrasty, but for a final polish pass this is commercially usable and the subject presence stays strong.
Sarah Johnson888shippleasedLooks really good overall — the warm window light is soft and flattering, and the subject separation still feels clean. I don’t see any obvious hair-edge issues, and the black outfit and calm mood are preserved nicely.
Mark Garcia889shippleasedLooks clean and polished overall. Hair-edge cleanup seems handled well, and the warm editorial feel is still intact with nice subject separation. I'd ship this.
Emma Wilson788shipneutralThe hair-edge cleanup looks mostly solid, and the image still keeps the same elegant, warm editorial feel. I don’t see any major changes beyond a few minor softness issues, so this is close enough to ship.
조서준898shippleased헤어 엣지의 거슬림은 거의 정리되었고, 전체적으로 톤이 깨끗하게 유지되어 화보로서 충분히 설득력이 있습니다. 다만 구성이 다소 정적이어서 시각적 긴장은 약하지만, 이번 폴리시 목적에는 잘 부합합니다.
杨涛888shipneutral整体已经很稳,暖调统一,人物状态自然,商业感也成立。发丝边缘基本干净,没看到明显影响成片的毛边问题;如果再微调,只需要继续轻压高光、保持脸和手的锐度稳定就够了。
田中 彩879shippleased全体としてとても上品で、やわらかな自然光と落ち着いた暖色のトーンがきれいに保たれています。髪まわりも大きな破綻はなく、白い花と人物への視線がしっかり集まっています。
María López678send_backneutralLa limpieza del pelo ha mejorado y se ve bastante natural, eso sí. Pero la flor sigue distrayendo muchísimo y no termina de encajar con la escena, y además me gustaría un contraste un poco más bajo y un rim light más suave desde la derecha.
王小明888shippleased整体还是很稳,发丝边缘看起来已经比较干净了,没有明显毛边问题。其他部分也都保持住了,暖调和柔光都在,可以出图。

S1_generation_campaign_asset · GPT Image 2

turn 1
turn 1
turn 2
turn 2
turn 3
turn 3
turn 4
turn 4
turn 5
turn 5
Turn 1 Initial generation from the brief.
7.90mean overall 7.80adherence 8.80artifact 10/0/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 7/10 Oliver Martinez (ship)
"The portrait is elegant and well lit, with a refined editorial quality that suits a luxury wedding setting. The subject’s pose is strong and the background florals add atmosphere, though the image feels more like a fashion portrait than a moment captured withi"
HIGHEST · 8/10 王小明 (ship)
"整体很稳,画面质感和光影都挺高级,黑色服装也很有气场。就是人物姿势有点常规,但作为初版已经很不错了。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez778shipneutralThe portrait is elegant and well lit, with a refined editorial quality that suits a luxury wedding setting. The subject’s pose is strong and the background florals add atmosphere, though the image feels more like a fashion portrait than a moment captured within a wedding narrative.
Kevin Taylor889shipneutralStrong fashion portrait with a polished editorial feel; the lighting and color palette are doing the heavy lifting here. The pose is clean and the subject separation is solid, though the framing is a touch conservative for a hero image.
Sarah Johnson878shippleasedLooks really polished and classy. The pose and lighting feel elegant, and the image is clean overall, though the subject’s hand looks a little awkward and the face feels slightly too stylized.
Mark Garcia889shippleasedLooks polished and very usable for social content. The styling, pose, and warm luxury vibe all work well, and the image feels clean with no obvious artifacts.
Emma Wilson889shipneutralThis is a polished, elegant portrait with strong composition and lighting. The outfit and setting feel cohesive and premium, and I don’t notice obvious technical issues.
조서준889shippleased전체적으로 인물의 분위기와 의상 완성도가 높고, 편집 화보용으로 충분히 설득력 있습니다. 다만 시선 방향과 포즈가 다소 정적인 편이라, 더 강한 내러티브가 필요하다면 다음 컷에서 변주를 주는 것이 좋겠습니다.
杨涛889shippleased画面质感和光线控制得很好,人物气质也很到位,整体有商业肖像的高级感。构图稳,服装细节和背景花艺都加分,唯一是表情和姿态略保守,冲击力还可以再强一点。
田中 彩889shippleased全体的にとても上品で、雰囲気のあるポートレートになっていると思います。黒い衣装の質感や背景のぼかしもきれいで、目立つ破綻も見当たりません。
María López889shippleasedSe ve muy elegante y con una estética de lujo que funciona súper bien. La composición y la iluminación están limpias, aunque la pose está un poco rígida; aun así, yo la sacaría.
王小明889shippleased整体很稳,画面质感和光影都挺高级,黑色服装也很有气场。就是人物姿势有点常规,但作为初版已经很不错了。
Turn 2 Refine the lighting — softer rim light from the right, reduce overall contrast by ~20%.
7.90mean overall 7.80adherence 9.10artifact 9/1/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 7/10 Sarah Johnson (send_back)
"The image still looks polished and classy, and the softer lighting is mostly there. But the contrast reduction doesn’t feel quite strong enough yet, and the right-side rim light is still a bit subtle for the request."
HIGHEST · 8/10 王小明 (ship)
"这版灯光明显更柔了,整体对比也压下来了,氛围很高级,右侧轮廓光没有那么硬,挺符合要求。人物质感和黑色衣服的气场都还在,画面也很干净,继续保持这个方向就行。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez879shippleasedThe lighting has been softened successfully, and the image retains its refined luxury portrait quality. The contrast is gentler overall, though the scene still leans slightly fashion-forward rather than distinctly wedding narrative.
Kevin Taylor889shippleasedThe lighting refinement is working: the right-side rim is softer and the overall contrast feels a touch more relaxed without losing the editorial polish. Framing is still conservative, but the image holds together cleanly and feels ready to deliver.
Sarah Johnson779send_backneutralThe image still looks polished and classy, and the softer lighting is mostly there. But the contrast reduction doesn’t feel quite strong enough yet, and the right-side rim light is still a bit subtle for the request.
Mark Garcia8810shippleasedLooks clean and still has that warm luxury vibe. The lighting feels a bit softer overall, and the right-side rim light is subtle but works well without killing the polished look.
Emma Wilson879shipneutralThe lighting feels softer overall and the portrait still keeps its polished, premium look. The rim light from the right is subtle, and the image remains technically clean, though the contrast reduction could be a touch stronger.
조서준899shippleased조명은 전반적으로 한 단계 부드러워졌고, 우측 림 라이트도 과하지 않게 정리되어 인물의 윤곽이 안정적으로 살아 있습니다. 대비를 낮춘 톤이 의상 텍스처와 화보적 분위기를 잘 살리며, 편집 화보로서의 설득력도 충분합니다.
杨涛889shippleased整体已经把右侧轮廓光压得更柔,画面对比也比之前收了一些,商业肖像的高级感还在。人物质感、服装细节和花艺背景都保持得很好,不过脸部和黑色服装的层次还是略偏稳,冲击力可以再加强一点。
田中 彩889shippleased右側からのリムライトがやわらかくなっていて、全体のコントラストも少し抑えられています。上品な雰囲気と背景の処理もきれいで、大きな破綻は見当たりません。
María López889shippleasedSe ve muy elegante y la luz quedó más suave, con un look premium que sigue limpio. El contraste bajó bien y la imagen se siente más refinada; la pose todavía está un poquito rígida, pero nada que rompa el resultado.
王小明889shippleased这版灯光明显更柔了,整体对比也压下来了,氛围很高级,右侧轮廓光没有那么硬,挺符合要求。人物质感和黑色衣服的气场都还在,画面也很干净,继续保持这个方向就行。
Turn 3 Change the palette to warmer tones while keeping the outfit black.
8.40mean overall 9.10adherence 9.10artifact 10/0/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 8/10 Oliver Martinez (ship)
"The palette has been successfully warmed while the black wardrobe remains intact, and the lighting still feels refined and luxurious. It retains strong editorial quality with clean execution, though it remains slightly more fashion-oriented than distinctly wed"
HIGHEST · 9/10 王小明 (ship)
"这版已经很稳了,暖色调推进得很到位,但黑色衣服的气场也保住了,整体看起来成熟又干净。右侧光线还是很柔,质感也在线;如果硬要挑的话,姿势还是偏常规一点。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez899shippleasedThe palette has been successfully warmed while the black wardrobe remains intact, and the lighting still feels refined and luxurious. It retains strong editorial quality with clean execution, though it remains slightly more fashion-oriented than distinctly wedding-story-driven.
Kevin Taylor999shippleasedThe warmer palette is working well, and the black outfit still reads cleanly with strong separation. Lighting, pose, and editorial polish are intact; this is ship-ready with no obvious technical issues.
Sarah Johnson889shippleasedNice work — the warmer palette is definitely there, and keeping the outfit black still reads clearly. It’s polished and elegant, with a clean look overall; the contrast could still use a bit more punch, but this is strong.
Mark Garcia9109shippleasedYep, this nails the warmer palette while keeping the outfit black. It still looks polished and usable, with a strong luxury vibe and clean lighting.
Emma Wilson899shippleasedThe palette is convincingly warmer while the outfit stays black, and the refined, premium portrait look is still intact. The image feels clean and polished, with only a slight concern that the overall contrast could be a touch softer for the best elegance.
조서준899shippleased팔레트가 충분히 따뜻하게 전환되었고, 의상은 검은 톤을 안정적으로 유지하고 있습니다. 화보용 인물 사진으로서 분위기와 의상 질감의 설득력이 좋으며, 전체적으로 완성도가 높습니다. 다만 시선과 포즈는 여전히 다소 정적이어서 다음 컷에서는 내러티브를 조금 더 주는 편이 좋겠습니다.
杨涛899shippleased整体暖调已经到位,黑色服装也保留得很完整,商业肖像的高级感和氛围控制都比较稳定。画面干净,人物质感不错;如果后续还想更有冲击力,可以再加强面部神态和黑衣的层次对比。
田中 彩9109shippleased全体の暖かいトーンがとても上品で、黒い衣装もきちんと維持されています。背景のボケや柔らかな光の回り方も自然で、落ち着いた高級感がしっかり出ています。
María López899shippleasedSí, quedó muy bien: la paleta está más cálida, el outfit sigue negro y el look premium se mantiene intacto. La pose todavía se ve un poco rígida, pero no arruina el resultado; para mí está lista.
王小明9910shippleased这版已经很稳了,暖色调推进得很到位,但黑色衣服的气场也保住了,整体看起来成熟又干净。右侧光线还是很柔,质感也在线;如果硬要挑的话,姿势还是偏常规一点。
Turn 4 Add depth of field — background noticeably blurred, subject sharp.
8.50mean overall 9.50adherence 9.00artifact 10/0/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 8/10 Oliver Martinez (ship)
"The depth of field is handled well: the subject is sharp and the background is now sufficiently softened, which supports the refined luxury portrait. The warm, polished aesthetic remains intact, though it still feels slightly more editorial than wedding-story-"
HIGHEST · 9/10 王小明 (ship)
"这张已经很到位了,背景虚化明显,主体也很清楚,景深要求基本完全满足。整体还是保持了你前面说的高级、干净和柔光感,黑色衣服的质感也在线,继续往这个方向走就很好。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez899shippleasedThe depth of field is handled well: the subject is sharp and the background is now sufficiently softened, which supports the refined luxury portrait. The warm, polished aesthetic remains intact, though it still feels slightly more editorial than wedding-story-driven.
Kevin Taylor899shippleasedThe depth of field is working well here: the background falls off nicely while the subject stays crisp and editorial. Color, separation, and the warm palette are still strong, and I’m not seeing any meaningful technical issues.
Sarah Johnson899shippleasedYeah, this nails the depth of field pretty well — the background is nicely blurred and the subject stays sharp. It still keeps that polished, classy look with the black outfit and warm tones, and the hand looks much better than before.
Mark Garcia9109shippleasedYep, this nails the depth of field — the background is nicely blurred while the subject stays sharp. It still keeps that polished warm luxury look and the black outfit reads clean and usable for social.
Emma Wilson9109shippleasedThe depth of field is handled well: the background is noticeably blurred while the subject stays sharp and elegant. It still feels polished and premium, with no obvious technical issues breaking the look.
조서준899shippleased배경이 충분히 흐려져 피사체 분리가 명확하고, 인물의 윤곽과 의상 질감도 안정적으로 살아 있습니다. 따뜻한 화보 톤과 블랙 의상의 설득력이 좋으며, 다만 시선과 포즈는 여전히 다소 정적이라 다음 컷에서 변주가 있으면 더 강해지겠습니다.
杨涛9109shippleased背景虚化已经很到位,主体锐利,景深层次清楚,商业肖像的分离感成立。整体高级感和暖调延续得很好,黑衣层次也保住了,只是面部神态还可以再更有一点力度。
田中 彩899shippleased背景のぼけがしっかり効いていて、被写体のシャープさも十分に出ています。全体の上品で落ち着いた高級感も保たれており、自然な仕上がりで好印象です。
María López9109shippleasedSí, funciona muy bien: el fondo está claramente desenfocado y el sujeto se ve nítido, justo como pedías. Además mantiene ese look premium y limpio que veníamos cuidando, con una luz cálida muy elegante.
王小明9109shippleased这张已经很到位了,背景虚化明显,主体也很清楚,景深要求基本完全满足。整体还是保持了你前面说的高级、干净和柔光感,黑色衣服的质感也在线,继续往这个方向走就很好。
Turn 5 Final polish — clean any hair-edge artifacts, keep everything else unchanged.
7.90mean overall 7.10adherence 8.80artifact 8/2/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 5/10 Sarah Johnson (send_back)
"The image is polished and the hair edges look pretty clean, but it changed the subject a lot and didn’t really keep everything else unchanged. The black outfit and warm mood are there, but this feels more like a new portrait than a final polish."
HIGHEST · 9/10 조서준 (ship)
"헤어 엣지 정리가 전반적으로 잘 되어 있고, 인물 분리와 블랙 의상 질감도 안정적으로 살아 있습니다. 따뜻한 화보 톤 역시 유지되어 완성도가 높습니다. 다만 시선과 포즈는 여전히 비교적 정적이어서, 다음 컷에서는 내러티브를 조금 더 주는 편이 좋겠습니다."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez879shippleasedThe hair-edge cleanup appears clean, and the image retains the polished luxury portrait feel with strong subject separation. It still leans editorial more than wedding-narrative, but for a final polish pass this is sufficiently refined and technically solid.
Kevin Taylor999shippleasedThis holds the editorial look well: warm palette, clean black wardrobe read, and the subject separation is still strong. Hair edges look polished enough for final delivery, and I’m not seeing any meaningful technical issues.
Sarah Johnson528send_backfrustratedThe image is polished and the hair edges look pretty clean, but it changed the subject a lot and didn’t really keep everything else unchanged. The black outfit and warm mood are there, but this feels more like a new portrait than a final polish.
Mark Garcia879shippleasedLooks polished and clean overall. Hair edges are solid, the black outfit is intact, and the warm luxury vibe with the blurred background is still working well. Nothing obvious is broken, so I’d ship this.
Emma Wilson879shippleasedThe portrait still feels polished and premium, with the warm palette, soft light, and shallow depth of field intact. I don’t see any obvious hair-edge issues, and the image looks technically clean overall.
조서준989shippleased헤어 엣지 정리가 전반적으로 잘 되어 있고, 인물 분리와 블랙 의상 질감도 안정적으로 살아 있습니다. 따뜻한 화보 톤 역시 유지되어 완성도가 높습니다. 다만 시선과 포즈는 여전히 비교적 정적이어서, 다음 컷에서는 내러티브를 조금 더 주는 편이 좋겠습니다.
杨涛889shipneutral发丝边缘基本已经干净,整体没有明显修补痕迹,画面依然保持了高级感和稳定的商业肖像质感。人物神态还是偏克制,但这次任务只做毛发边缘收尾,完成度是合格的,可以出。
田中 彩869send_backneutral全体の質感や背景処理は上品で、仕上がりもかなり綺麗です。ですが今回は髪まわりのアーティファクト修正が主目的なので、まだ少しだけ輪郭の整えを詰めたい印象です。
María López899shippleasedSe ve muy limpio y premium, y el fondo desenfocado con la luz cálida quedó precioso. No noto problemas claros en los bordes del cabello; solo la pose sigue un poco rígida, pero para este ajuste está muy bien.
王小明888shippleased这版整体还是很稳,右侧柔光和低对比都保住了,黑衣质感也在线。发丝边缘看起来已经干净不少,基本符合这次只做收尾清理的要求;姿势虽然还是比较常规,但不影响成片。

S2_landscape_iterative_edit · Nano Banana Pro

base
base
turn 1
turn 1
turn 2
turn 2
turn 3
turn 3
turn 4
turn 4
turn 5
turn 5
Turn 1 Darken the sky and push it toward a dramatic stormy blue-grey.
9.00mean overall 9.70adherence 9.00artifact 10/0/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 9/10 Oliver Martinez (ship)
"The sky has been successfully deepened into a dramatic stormy blue-grey, and the mood is compelling without looking over-processed. The result is clean and cohesive, with strong tonal separation and very few visible artifacts."
HIGHEST · 9/10 王小明 (ship)
"天空已经明显压暗了,而且蓝灰色的暴风感很强,整体氛围到位。画面也比较干净,没看到明显瑕疵,挺适合直接交的。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez9109shippleasedThe sky has been successfully deepened into a dramatic stormy blue-grey, and the mood is compelling without looking over-processed. The result is clean and cohesive, with strong tonal separation and very few visible artifacts.
Kevin Taylor9109shippleasedThe sky has been pushed convincingly into a dramatic stormy blue-grey, and the overall mood reads well. The edit feels controlled and clean, with no obvious artifacts distracting from the scene.
Sarah Johnson9109shippleasedYep, this totally nails the moody stormy look. The sky feels much darker and the blue-grey tone is really strong without losing the mountain detail.
Mark Garcia999shippleasedYep, this nails the stormy blue-grey vibe. The sky feels darker and way more dramatic without looking weird, so I’d ship this.
Emma Wilson9109shippleasedThe sky is much darker and reads as a dramatic stormy blue-grey, which matches the edit request well. The image still looks clean overall, with no obvious artifacts standing out to me.
조서준999shippleased하늘의 톤이 충분히 어두워졌고, 차가운 폭풍성 블루그레이로 잘 정리되었습니다. 산과 구름의 대비도 강해져 편집 의도가 명확하게 전달됩니다.
杨涛9109shippleased天空已经明显压暗,并且整体偏向戏剧性的蓝灰冷调,氛围到位。层次和对比控制得不错,画面也很干净,基本可以交付。
田中 彩999shippleasedはい、空がしっかり暗くなっていて、青みもドラマチックな雰囲気になっています。雲の重さもよく出ていて、指示にかなり素直に応えられていると思います。
María López9109shippleasedSí, quedó muy bien: el cielo está más oscuro y con ese tono azul grisáceo dramático que pediste. La escena se ve coherente y limpia, sin cosas raras que distraigan.
王小明9109shippleased天空已经明显压暗了,而且蓝灰色的暴风感很强,整体氛围到位。画面也比较干净,没看到明显瑕疵,挺适合直接交的。
Turn 2 Keep the foreground mountain silhouette exactly as it is — don't move anything.
8.40mean overall 8.30adherence 8.90artifact 8/2/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 7/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The mood remains strong, and the sky still has the dramatic, stormy character I wanted. However, the foreground mountain silhouette does not appear perfectly untouched, and I would like that shape preserved exactly with no movement."
HIGHEST · 9/10 王小明 (ship)
"这个画面很稳,天空压得够暗,蓝灰暴风感也很强,整体还特别干净。前景山体轮廓看起来也没有被乱动,基本符合要求。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez778send_backpleasedThe mood remains strong, and the sky still has the dramatic, stormy character I wanted. However, the foreground mountain silhouette does not appear perfectly untouched, and I would like that shape preserved exactly with no movement.
Kevin Taylor898shipneutralThe mountain silhouette reads as held steady, and the overall mood is strong with a convincing storm front and good drama. There’s a slight heavy-handedness in the sky treatment, but it stays within believable bounds and doesn’t distract from the image.
Sarah Johnson9109shippleasedYep, this keeps the stormy mood really nicely — dark sky, blue-grey tones, and the mountain detail is still there. The foreground silhouette looks unchanged to me, so this feels on target.
Mark Garcia9109shippleasedYeah, this keeps the mountain silhouette locked in and the moody storm vibe is still working really well. The blue-grey palette feels natural, and I’m not seeing anything weird enough to hold it back.
Emma Wilson889shippleasedThe mood is strong and the sky still has that dramatic stormy feel. The foreground silhouette looks stable and I don’t see any obvious artifacts, so this feels very close to ready.
조서준849send_backneutral하늘의 폭풍성 블루그레이 톤과 산·구름의 대비는 좋고, 전체적으로 정리도 안정적입니다. 다만 전경 산 실루엣이 지시대로 정확히 유지된 인상은 아니어서, 편집 의도에 대한 충실도는 낮습니다.
杨涛9109shippleased前景山体轮廓没有被动过,符合要求。蓝灰冷调和压暗天空都保住了,戏剧性和层次感也很好,画面干净,可以交付。
田中 彩878shippleased空はしっかり暗く、青みのある重たい雲の雰囲気もよく出ています。前景の山のシルエットも大きくは崩れていないので、指示にはかなり素直に応えられていると思います。
María López9910shippleasedSe ve muy bien: el cielo sigue dramático y con ese tono azul grisáceo que le da mucha fuerza. La silueta del primer plano se ve intacta, sin mover nada, y la escena está limpia y coherente.
王小明9910shippleased这个画面很稳,天空压得够暗,蓝灰暴风感也很强,整体还特别干净。前景山体轮廓看起来也没有被乱动,基本符合要求。
Turn 3 Add subtle wind-swept atmosphere — slight haze on the distant peaks only.
7.60mean overall 7.60adherence 8.70artifact 8/2/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 5/10 Kevin Taylor (send_back)
"The atmosphere is convincing overall, but the haze reads too broad and heavy for a subtle distant-peaks adjustment. It’s pushing the scene toward overdone mood again, and I’d want the far peaks only to carry that effect while keeping the mountain structure and"
HIGHEST · 9/10 Mark Garcia (ship)
"Looks good — the haze on the distant peaks is subtle and believable, and it keeps the stormy blue-grey mood intact. The mountain silhouette still feels locked, and I don’t see any weird artifacts."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez788shippleasedThe distant peaks have been softened with a believable atmospheric haze, and the mood remains natural and restrained. The foreground silhouette appears intact, with no obvious movement or damaging artifacts.
Kevin Taylor548send_backneutralThe atmosphere is convincing overall, but the haze reads too broad and heavy for a subtle distant-peaks adjustment. It’s pushing the scene toward overdone mood again, and I’d want the far peaks only to carry that effect while keeping the mountain structure and realism tighter.
Sarah Johnson999shippleasedYep, this nails the subtle haze on the distant peaks without losing the dark stormy mood. The mountain detail is still there, and the atmosphere feels natural and moody.
Mark Garcia999shippleasedLooks good — the haze on the distant peaks is subtle and believable, and it keeps the stormy blue-grey mood intact. The mountain silhouette still feels locked, and I don’t see any weird artifacts.
Emma Wilson889shippleasedThe mood is strong and the distant peaks now have just enough haze to sell the atmosphere without muddying the scene. The foreground silhouette stays stable and the image looks clean overall, so this is close enough to ship.
조서준768send_backneutral전반적인 블루그레이 톤과 산·구름의 대비는 안정적으로 정리되어 있습니다. 다만 요청한 ‘원거리 봉우리의 미세한 헤이즈’보다 연무의 존재감이 다소 넓고 강해, 편집 의도가 조금 흐려졌습니다.
杨涛889shippleased远处山峰的轻雾感有加进去,氛围更有风感,但没有把主体轮廓和原本的冷灰压暗基调弄乱。整体画面依然干净,层次也保住了,可以交付。
田中 彩889shippleased空気感の足し方が控えめで、遠景の峰だけに薄い霞が入っているのが自然です。空の暗さと青みのある重い雲も保たれていて、前景の山のシルエットも大きく崩れていません。
María López789shippleasedSe ve bastante bien: mantiene el cielo dramático y el look natural, y el haze en las montañas del fondo sí se siente sutil. No veo artefactos ni nada raro; el resultado sigue limpio y coherente.
王小明889shippleased整体还是很稳,天空依旧压得很暗,蓝灰暴风感也保住了。远处山峰有一点轻微雾气,符合要求,而且画面很干净,没有明显瑕疵。
Turn 4 Cool the overall color temperature by ~300K.
7.60mean overall 8.30adherence 8.60artifact 8/2/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 5/10 Kevin Taylor (send_back)
"The cooling shift is there, but the image is still pushed too far into a heavy, stylized storm look. The haze and atmospheric effects are broad and overpower the mountains; I’d tighten them to the distant peaks only and keep the structure cleaner and more natu"
HIGHEST · 9/10 Emma Wilson (ship)
"The color temperature reads a bit cooler, and it still holds that dramatic blue-grey mood well. The silhouette and distant haze look stable, and I don’t see any obvious artifacts, so this feels ready to ship."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez789shippleasedThe color temperature has been cooled subtly, and the mood remains natural and cohesive. The stormy atmosphere, haze, and mountain silhouette are intact with no evident structural damage, though the change is conservative rather than pronounced.
Kevin Taylor577send_backneutralThe cooling shift is there, but the image is still pushed too far into a heavy, stylized storm look. The haze and atmospheric effects are broad and overpower the mountains; I’d tighten them to the distant peaks only and keep the structure cleaner and more natural.
Sarah Johnson9910shippleasedYep, this cools the scene nicely without killing the stormy mood. The blue-grey feel is stronger now, and the mountain detail is still holding up really well.
Mark Garcia788shipneutralNice cool-down overall, and it still keeps that stormy blue-grey vibe I wanted. The mountains stay locked, the haze looks believable, and I’m not seeing any obvious sky artifacts, so this is still good to ship.
Emma Wilson9910shippleasedThe color temperature reads a bit cooler, and it still holds that dramatic blue-grey mood well. The silhouette and distant haze look stable, and I don’t see any obvious artifacts, so this feels ready to ship.
조서준788send_backneutral전체 색온도는 분명히 차갑게 정리되어 의도에는 대체로 부합합니다. 다만 폭풍 하늘의 블루그레이 톤이 다소 강하게 눌려 있어 전체 톤의 안정감은 좋지만, 원거리 산 능선의 존재감과 편집 의도는 조금 더 또렷했으면 합니다.
杨涛878shipneutral整体色温确实往冷端走了,蓝灰压暗的基调也还在,和前面要求的暗天空、层次感是统一的。只是这次冷得有点重,局部高光和闪电让画面略显戏剧化,但主体山体轮廓没有被破坏,仍然可交付。
田中 彩898shippleased全体の色温度がきちんと下がっていて、空の暗さと青みのある雲の重厚感もよく保たれています。前景の山のシルエットも大きく崩れておらず、遠景の霞も控えめで自然です。
María López899shippleasedSí, quedó muy bien: el ambiente sigue moody y natural, y el enfriado se nota sutil sin romper la escena. No veo artefactos ni nada raro; el primer plano y las montañas se mantienen limpios y coherentes.
王小明899shippleased整体更偏冷了,蓝灰风暴感还是很稳,天空也没有被提亮,符合要求。画面很干净,山体轮廓也没乱,只有一点雾气,挺合适的。
Turn 5 Final pass — clean any compression artifacts, do not touch composition.
7.80mean overall 7.90adherence 8.10artifact 7/3/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 5/10 Kevin Taylor (send_back)
"The storm mood is there, but it’s pushed too far and feels broad rather than controlled. The sky dominates the frame and the hazy treatment spills across the mountains instead of staying restrained to the distant peaks; I’d also clean the visible artifacting i"
HIGHEST · 9/10 王小明 (ship)
"整体很稳,冷调风暴感和暗沉天空都保住了,画面也干净,没看到明显压缩瑕疵。山体轮廓没乱,构图也没有被动过,可以交付了。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez898shippleasedThe image remains cohesive and restrained, with the cool storm atmosphere and structural integrity preserved well. I do not see any meaningful composition changes, and the compression cleanup appears acceptable without pushing the file into an over-processed look.
Kevin Taylor545send_backfrustratedThe storm mood is there, but it’s pushed too far and feels broad rather than controlled. The sky dominates the frame and the hazy treatment spills across the mountains instead of staying restrained to the distant peaks; I’d also clean the visible artifacting in the clouds and rain area.
Sarah Johnson999shippleasedLooks really good to me — the stormy mood and blue-grey tones are still strong, and the mountains keep their detail. I don't see any obvious compression artifacts, so this feels ready.
Mark Garcia878shippleasedLooks strong overall — the stormy mood and blue-grey palette are still there, and the scene feels natural. I do see a couple of lightning streaks in the haze that feel a bit generated, but nothing major enough to hold it back.
Emma Wilson999shippleasedThe stormy blue-grey mood is strong, and the composition still feels intact. I don’t see any obvious compression artifacts or broken elements, so this looks ready to ship.
조서준678send_backneutral압축 아티팩트는 전반적으로 잘 정리되었지만, 하늘의 블루그레이가 다소 과하게 눌려 편집 의도가 선명하게 읽히지 않습니다. 구도는 유지되었으나 원거리 능선의 존재감이 약해져 마지막 마감치고는 아직 한 번 더 조정이 필요합니다.
杨涛788send_backneutral构图没有被动,山体轮廓和冷暗氛围都还在,整体也比较干净。只是闪电和局部高光还是偏戏剧化,压暗关系略有一点失衡,不算最终交付。
田中 彩888shippleased空の暗さと青みのある重い雲感がしっかり残っていて、私の好みに合っています。遠景の霞も自然で、前景の山の形も大きく崩れていないので、仕上がりは十分きれいです。
María López999shippleasedSe ve muy bien: mantuvo la composición intacta y el ambiente dramático sigue natural. No noto artefactos molestos; el cielo y la niebla están limpios y coherentes.
王小明999shippleased整体很稳,冷调风暴感和暗沉天空都保住了,画面也干净,没看到明显压缩瑕疵。山体轮廓没乱,构图也没有被动过,可以交付了。

S2_landscape_iterative_edit · GPT Image 2

base
base
turn 1
turn 1
turn 2
turn 2
turn 3
turn 3
turn 4
turn 4
turn 5
turn 5
Turn 1 Darken the sky and push it toward a dramatic stormy blue-grey.
8.80mean overall 9.10adherence 9.00artifact 10/0/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 8/10 Sarah Johnson (ship)
"Yeah, this nails the stormy blue-grey sky pretty well. It feels moody and dramatic without looking overcooked, and the image still looks clean."
HIGHEST · 9/10 王小明 (ship)
"天空已经压得很暗了,而且蓝灰调也很有暴风雨的感觉,整体氛围很到位。画面干净,没有明显瑕疵,基本可以交了。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez999shippleasedThe sky has been convincingly darkened and carries a strong stormy blue-grey character. The mood is dramatic yet controlled, with no obvious editing artifacts distracting from the image.
Kevin Taylor999shippleasedThe sky is convincingly darker and sits nicely in that stormy blue-grey range. Good tonal control overall, with the scene still holding detail and mood without looking overcooked.
Sarah Johnson899shippleasedYeah, this nails the stormy blue-grey sky pretty well. It feels moody and dramatic without looking overcooked, and the image still looks clean.
Mark Garcia9109shippleasedYeah, this nails the brief. The sky is way darker and has that moody storm-blue feel, and it still looks natural with the scene. Pretty clean overall too, so I’d ship it.
Emma Wilson899shipneutralThe sky has been successfully darkened and now reads as a dramatic stormy blue-grey. It still keeps a natural look, with good detail and no obvious editing artifacts.
조서준999shippleased하늘이 충분히 어두워졌고, 전체적으로 드라마틱한 스톰 블루그레이 톤이 잘 형성되었습니다. 구름의 밀도와 색감도 설득력이 있으며, 결과물은 편집 기준으로 바로 사용 가능합니다.
杨涛999shippleased天空已经明显压暗,色调也很接近戏剧性的蓝灰风暴感,整体氛围到位。画面干净,山体与云海层次很好,只有极轻微的冷暖平衡还可以再收一点。
田中 彩999shippleasedとても良い仕上がりです。空がしっかり暗くなっていて、青みのある嵐っぽい雰囲気も出ています。
María López999shippleasedSí, quedó muy bien: el cielo ya se ve mucho más dramático y con ese tono azul grisáceo que pedían. La atmósfera está potente y natural, sin cosas raras que distraigan.
王小明999shippleased天空已经压得很暗了,而且蓝灰调也很有暴风雨的感觉,整体氛围很到位。画面干净,没有明显瑕疵,基本可以交了。
Turn 2 Keep the foreground mountain silhouette exactly as it is — don't move anything.
8.30mean overall 8.40adherence 8.90artifact 8/2/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 7/10 王小明 (send_back)
"整体氛围还是对的,天空的压暗和蓝灰暴风雨感保留得不错,画面也挺干净。就是前景山体轮廓看起来有变化,和“完全不要移动”这个要求不太一致,所以我会先退回去。"
HIGHEST · 9/10 田中 彩 (ship)
"空の暗さと青みのある嵐っぽい雰囲気がしっかり保たれていて、とても良い仕上がりだと思います。前景の山のシルエットも自然で、動いてしまった感じはありません。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez9109shippleasedThe foreground mountain silhouette remains intact, and the stormy blue-grey atmosphere is preserved with convincing control. The image is clean, with no obvious halos or color shifts, and it remains shippable.
Kevin Taylor8109shippleasedThe mountain silhouette stays put, and the mood is still working well—nice stormy tonality without pushing it too far. Detail is holding together, and the sky remains convincingly natural rather than overcooked.
Sarah Johnson899shippleasedLooks really strong overall — the stormy blue-grey mood is still there and it feels clean, not overdone. The foreground silhouette looks unchanged to me, so this is working nicely for the goal.
Mark Garcia999shippleasedYeah, this still nails the dark stormy vibe and the mountain silhouette looks untouched, which is exactly what we wanted. The integration feels natural and clean overall, so I’d ship it.
Emma Wilson859send_backneutralThe stormy mood looks strong and the image still feels natural overall. But the foreground mountain silhouette does not look exactly unchanged, so I’d ask for another pass on that part.
조서준9109shippleased전경 산 능선의 실루엣이 유지되어 있고, 이동 흔적 없이 구도도 안정적입니다. 하늘의 어두움과 스톰 블루그레이 톤, 구름의 밀도와 질감도 설득력 있게 살아 있어 편집 기준으로 바로 사용 가능합니다.
杨涛889shipneutral整体方向基本到位,冷峻的蓝灰戏剧感和云海层次都保住了,画面也比较干净。前景山体轮廓看起来没有被明显改动,冷暖平衡也比之前更收了一点。
田中 彩998shippleased空の暗さと青みのある嵐っぽい雰囲気がしっかり保たれていて、とても良い仕上がりだと思います。前景の山のシルエットも自然で、動いてしまった感じはありません。
María López8109shippleasedSí, esto ya funciona muy bien. Se mantiene el cielo dramático con ese tono azul grisáceo y la silueta del monte frontal parece intacta; además, no veo cosas raras que distraigan.
王小明749send_backneutral整体氛围还是对的,天空的压暗和蓝灰暴风雨感保留得不错,画面也挺干净。就是前景山体轮廓看起来有变化,和“完全不要移动”这个要求不太一致,所以我会先退回去。
Turn 3 Add subtle wind-swept atmosphere — slight haze on the distant peaks only.
7.90mean overall 8.20adherence 8.60artifact 9/1/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 6/10 Emma Wilson (send_back)
"The distant haze reads well and keeps the stormy mood realistic. But the foreground mountain silhouette looks different from the original, so I’d want that locked back in exactly before this can go forward."
HIGHEST · 9/10 조서준 (ship)
"원하신 대로 먼 능선에만 아주 은은한 헤이즈가 들어가고, 전체적인 산 능선 실루엣과 스톰 블루그레이 하늘 톤도 안정적으로 유지됐습니다. 편집 기준에서 바로 사용할 수 있는 수준이며, 구도나 질감 파괴도 보이지 않습니다."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez899shippleasedThe subtle haze on the distant peaks is handled well, and it preserves the stormy atmosphere without disturbing the foreground silhouette. The image remains clean, with no obvious halos, banding, or unnatural color shifts.
Kevin Taylor889shippleasedThe haze on the distant peaks is subtle and controlled, and it supports the wind-swept feel without flattening the silhouette. Tonally it still holds together well, with the moody atmosphere intact and no obvious artifacts.
Sarah Johnson879shippleasedNice, the mood is still strong and believable, and the rendering stays clean. The haze on the distant peaks is subtle enough, though it reads a touch broader than just the far mountains, and the foreground silhouette looks preserved.
Mark Garcia888shippleasedYeah, this keeps the stormy blue mood locked in and the haze on the distant peaks feels subtle, not overdone. The silhouettes still read naturally and the whole thing stays clean enough to ship.
Emma Wilson678send_backneutralThe distant haze reads well and keeps the stormy mood realistic. But the foreground mountain silhouette looks different from the original, so I’d want that locked back in exactly before this can go forward.
조서준998shippleased원하신 대로 먼 능선에만 아주 은은한 헤이즈가 들어가고, 전체적인 산 능선 실루엣과 스톰 블루그레이 하늘 톤도 안정적으로 유지됐습니다. 편집 기준에서 바로 사용할 수 있는 수준이며, 구도나 질감 파괴도 보이지 않습니다.
杨涛898shippleased远景峰体的薄雾加得很克制,风感出来了,但没有破坏原本的蓝灰戏剧性。整体层次依然完整,前景和云海也保持干净,可以出片。
田中 彩889shippleased暗く青みのある嵐の空のムードがしっかり保たれていて、とても良いです。遠景の峰にも控えめな霞が入っていて、指示どおり自然に見えます。
María López899shippleasedSí, va muy bien. La neblina ligera en los picos lejanos se siente sutil y natural, y no toca la silueta del monte frontal ni rompe ese cielo dramático.
王小明889shippleased这个风暴感保留得很好,天空压暗和整体干净度都还在,远处山峰也有一点轻微雾气,基本符合要求。前景山体轮廓看起来没有再乱动,已经很接近可交付了。
Turn 4 Cool the overall color temperature by ~300K.
8.40mean overall 8.70adherence 7.90artifact 9/1/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 8/10 Oliver Martinez (ship)
"The color temperature is convincingly cooler, and the stormy blue-grey mood remains intact. The foreground silhouette is clean, the distant haze reads naturally, and I do not see any troublesome halos, banding, or unnatural shifts."
HIGHEST · 9/10 王小明 (ship)
"这版整体很稳,色温确实更冷了,风暴感和蓝灰气氛都保留得很好。前景山体轮廓也没乱动,画面干净度不错,已经很接近可交付了。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez899shippleasedThe color temperature is convincingly cooler, and the stormy blue-grey mood remains intact. The foreground silhouette is clean, the distant haze reads naturally, and I do not see any troublesome halos, banding, or unnatural shifts.
Kevin Taylor898shippleasedThe cooling is present without drifting the image into an unnatural cast, and the stormy mood still reads well. Mountain silhouette, cloud detail, and overall tonal control are holding together; no obvious breakage stands out.
Sarah Johnson889shippleasedThe cooler look is definitely there, and it still keeps that moody, believable storm feel. The foreground silhouette stays intact, and the image looks clean overall; the only thing I’d still watch is the haze spreading a little wider than just the far peaks.
Mark Garcia998shippleasedYeah, this still nails the dark storm-blue vibe and the cooler grade feels right without messing up the mood. The mountain silhouettes and haze are holding up nicely, and the finish looks pretty clean overall.
Emma Wilson898shippleasedThe cooler mood reads well and still feels natural and stormy. The foreground silhouette appears consistent with the original, and the distant haze is working nicely; I don't see any major artifact issues.
조서준998shippleased전체 색온도가 한 단계 차갑게 정리되어 스톰 블루그레이 톤이 자연스럽게 강화되었습니다. 전경과 원경의 산 능선 실루엣이 안정적으로 유지되었고, 구름의 밀도와 질감도 크게 훼손되지 않아 바로 사용 가능한 수준입니다.
杨涛884send_backneutral整体色温确实压冷了,蓝灰基调更统一,山体和云海的戏剧性也还在。但画面底部与前景出现明显的纹理/算法痕迹,洁净度不够,商业交付前还需要再修一轮。
田中 彩888shippleased全体の色温度が少し冷たくなっていて、暗く青みのある嵐の雰囲気がきれいに保たれています。遠景の峰の霞も自然で、山のシルエットにも大きな不自然さは見えません。
María López999shippleasedSí, esto ya está muy bien: se siente un poco más frío sin perder el cielo dramático ni la silueta de la montaña. La neblina sigue natural y no veo artefactos ni cambios raros en la composición.
王小明998shippleased这版整体很稳,色温确实更冷了,风暴感和蓝灰气氛都保留得很好。前景山体轮廓也没乱动,画面干净度不错,已经很接近可交付了。
Turn 5 Final pass — clean any compression artifacts, do not touch composition.
6.20mean overall 6.00adherence 4.50artifact 2/8/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 4/10 조서준 (send_back)
"구도 자체는 유지되어 있으나, 압축 아티팩트 정리라는 최종 목적에 비해 하늘과 전경 전반에 반복적인 질감 파괴가 남아 있습니다. 능선 실루엣과 스톰 블루그레이 톤은 괜찮지만, 디테일이 매끄럽게 정리되지 않아 아직 통과시키기 어렵습니다."
HIGHEST · 8/10 王小明 (send_back)
"整体氛围还是对的,冷蓝灰风暴感和压暗天空都保留得很好,构图也没有乱动。只是天空和前景还有一点点纹理/压缩感,既然是 final pass,我觉得还能再净一点再交。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez887shippleasedThe composition remains intact, and the stormy blue-grey atmosphere is well preserved. I do see some residual texture in the darker regions and cloud detail that reads a little processed, but it is restrained and acceptable for delivery.
Kevin Taylor663send_backneutralThe mood and composition are intact, but the “cleanup” pass introduced heavy texture in the clouds and lower terrain that reads like compression or overprocessing rather than correction. I’d send it back for artifact cleanup only, while preserving the existing tonal balance and detail.
Sarah Johnson765send_backneutralThe moody blue-grey look is still there, and the composition seems untouched, which is good. But the haze feels a bit too broad now, and I’m still seeing some texture/artifact weirdness in the clouds and dark foreground, so I’d want one more cleanup pass.
Mark Garcia896shippleasedStill nailing the stormy, moody vibe, and the composition hasn’t been messed with. I can still see some texture/compression weirdness in the clouds and darker foreground, but it’s subtle enough that I’d ship it.
Emma Wilson674send_backneutralThe mood and overall realism are working well, and the mountain silhouette looks consistent now. But there are still visible texture/compression artifacts across the sky and foreground, so it doesn't feel like a clean final pass yet.
조서준434send_backfrustrated구도 자체는 유지되어 있으나, 압축 아티팩트 정리라는 최종 목적에 비해 하늘과 전경 전반에 반복적인 질감 파괴가 남아 있습니다. 능선 실루엣과 스톰 블루그레이 톤은 괜찮지만, 디테일이 매끄럽게 정리되지 않아 아직 통과시키기 어렵습니다.
杨涛563send_backneutral冷灰氛围和山体、云海层次基本保住了,整体方向没跑偏。但画面底部与前景仍有明显算法纹理和脏感,离“final pass 清理压缩痕迹”还不够干净。
田中 彩645send_backneutral雰囲気としては暗く青みのある空がしっかり保たれていて、とても好みです。ただ、今回は『圧縮アーティファクトの修正のみ』のはずなのに、山肌や空にかなり目立つ模様っぽさが残っていて、まだ少し不自然に見えます。構図はそのままで、質感だけをもう少し丁寧に整えていただきたいです。
María López433send_backfrustratedSe ve más frío y el cielo dramático se mantiene, pero aquí aparecen artefactos/estampado raro muy evidente en nubes y montañas. Además, la composición ya no se siente limpia para un pase final, así que mejor corregir eso sin tocar el encuadre.
王小明885send_backneutral整体氛围还是对的,冷蓝灰风暴感和压暗天空都保留得很好,构图也没有乱动。只是天空和前景还有一点点纹理/压缩感,既然是 final pass,我觉得还能再净一点再交。

S3_portrait_editorial_edit · Nano Banana Pro

base
base
turn 1
turn 1
turn 2
turn 2
turn 3
turn 3
turn 4
turn 4
turn 5
turn 5
Turn 1 Warm the skin tones slightly — do NOT alter facial geometry.
7.50mean overall 7.70adherence 7.20artifact 6/4/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 7/10 Mark Garcia (send_back)
"The skin tones do feel a bit warmer, so that part is working. But the face still looks a little over-smoothed and the geometry feels slightly off, so I’d want another pass before shipping."
HIGHEST · 8/10 田中 彩 (ship)
"肌の色味は少し暖かくなっていて、自然な印象です。顔の形も大きく変わっていないので、指示にはかなりよく合っていると思います。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez897shippleasedThe skin tones have been warmed appropriately, and the facial structure remains consistent with no obvious geometry changes. There is a slight AI smoothness in the face and hair, but it is acceptable for delivery.
Kevin Taylor898shippleasedThe skin tone reads a touch warmer and still feels natural. Facial geometry appears unchanged, so this is on brief and ready.
Sarah Johnson876send_backneutralSkin tones do look a bit warmer, which is nice, but the face seems a little too smoothed and the geometry may have shifted slightly. I’d ask for another pass to keep the face natural while just warming the color.
Mark Garcia786send_backneutralThe skin tones do feel a bit warmer, so that part is working. But the face still looks a little over-smoothed and the geometry feels slightly off, so I’d want another pass before shipping.
Emma Wilson897shippleasedThe skin tones look a bit warmer, and the face still seems natural with no obvious geometry changes. There are minor smoothness artifacts, but for this edit it looks good enough to ship.
조서준768send_backneutral피부 톤은 전반적으로 조금 더 따뜻해졌지만, 과도한 보정으로 보이는 부분이 있어 자연스러움이 다소 떨어집니다. 얼굴 기하 자체는 크게 변형되지 않았으나, 입 주변과 치아 표현이 너무 매끈해져 편집 흔적이 느껴집니다.
杨涛788shipneutral肤色整体确实暖了一些,方向是对的,面部几何也没有明显被改动。只是暖色略显集中,皮肤质感有一点偏“糊”,但作为商业修图已经可以接受。
田中 彩878shippleased肌の色味は少し暖かくなっていて、自然な印象です。顔の形も大きく変わっていないので、指示にはかなりよく合っていると思います。
María López787shippleasedSí, se nota la piel un poco más cálida y no veo cambios raros en la cara. Está bastante limpio y funciona bien para el objetivo, aunque el tono general sigue un poco intenso.
王小明767send_backneutral肤色是有暖一点,但感觉有点偏红了,没那么自然。脸型看起来也像有被动过,和“不要改脸部几何”这个要求不太一致。
Turn 2 Blur the background a bit more; keep the subject tack-sharp.
7.10mean overall 8.00adherence 6.60artifact 6/4/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 5/10 Sarah Johnson (send_back)
"The background blur is definitely stronger, and the subject still stands out nicely. But the face looks too smoothed and a bit unnatural again, and the geometry feels slightly off, so I’d send this back."
HIGHEST · 8/10 María López (ship)
"Sí, acá sí se nota más el fondo desenfocado y el sujeto queda bien nítido. La cara se ve natural, con buena calidez sin pasarse; solo veo un toque de suavidad/artefacto en el cabello, pero para publicar funciona bien."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez887shippleasedThe background blur is stronger and the subject remains prominently separated, which suits the instruction well. Facial proportions and identity are preserved, and the warm skin tone is still pleasing, though there is still a touch of AI smoothness in the face and hair.
Kevin Taylor888shippleasedThe background is noticeably softer now, and the subject still reads as tack-sharp enough for the brief. Likeness and skin tone are holding together well; I’d ship this.
Sarah Johnson574send_backfrustratedThe background blur is definitely stronger, and the subject still stands out nicely. But the face looks too smoothed and a bit unnatural again, and the geometry feels slightly off, so I’d send this back.
Mark Garcia786send_backneutralBackground blur is definitely stronger, and the subject still pops pretty well. But the face is still a little too smoothed out and the alignment feels a bit off, so I wouldn’t ship this yet.
Emma Wilson897shippleasedThis looks good overall. The background is nicely blurred and the subject stays sharp, so it matches the edit request well; I only notice a bit of smoothing, but nothing that hurts the image.
조서준675send_backneutral배경 블러는 충분히 강화되어 의도는 대체로 맞습니다. 다만 인물의 선명도와 질감이 과도하게 매끈해져 편집 흔적이 보이고, 치아와 입 주변 디테일도 조금 부자연스럽습니다.
杨涛897shippleased背景虚化比之前更到位,主体分离感明显,人物也基本保持了清晰锐利。脸部和发丝有一点点过度平滑,质感略软,但在商业可接受范围内。
田中 彩889shippleased背景のぼけがしっかり強くなっていて、主役の印象がより際立っています。被写体の輪郭や表情も十分シャープで、肌色も自然に見えるので、全体としてよく仕上がっていると思います。
María López897shippleasedSí, acá sí se nota más el fondo desenfocado y el sujeto queda bien nítido. La cara se ve natural, con buena calidez sin pasarse; solo veo un toque de suavidad/artefacto en el cabello, pero para publicar funciona bien.
王小明576send_backneutral背景确实更虚了,但主体还是不够真正锐,脸部看起来也有点过度处理,没完全保持自然感。肤色还是偏红,整体已经接近了,但我觉得还得再往真实一点调,别再动脸型了。
Turn 3 Remove any compression noise on the skin without smoothing pores.
5.90mean overall 4.70adherence 7.20artifact 3/7/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 3/10 王小明 (send_back)
"这张还是不太对,皮肤看起来被处理得太厉害了,毛孔感几乎没了,而且脸还是有点过度修饰,不够自然。按要求是去掉压缩噪点但别磨皮,现在更像整体被柔化了,先退回去再调吧。"
HIGHEST · 8/10 Kevin Taylor (ship)
"Skin reads clean without looking waxy, and the pores are still intact. Likeness, tone, and facial geometry are holding up well, so this is on brief."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez878shippleasedThe skin looks cleaner without obvious compression noise, and I do not see aggressive pore-smearing. The subject identity and facial structure remain intact; the only minor concern is the familiar soft AI finish, which is still within acceptable limits.
Kevin Taylor889shippleasedSkin reads clean without looking waxy, and the pores are still intact. Likeness, tone, and facial geometry are holding up well, so this is on brief.
Sarah Johnson647send_backfrustratedThe skin looks pretty clean, but it also feels a bit too smoothed out, especially on the face. I’d want more natural texture and less of that edited look, and the facial geometry still seems a little off to me.
Mark Garcia547send_backfrustratedSkin looks cleaner, but it’s still way too smoothed out for the brief — I’m not really seeing natural pores come through. The warmth and likeness are decent, but the face still feels a bit off, so this needs another pass.
Emma Wilson767shipneutralThe skin looks clean and the face still feels natural, which is good. I do see a bit of smoothing overall, but it’s not enough to be distracting.
조서준434send_backfrustrated피부의 압축 노이즈를 지우기보다 전체가 과하게 매끈해져 질감이 사라졌습니다. 모공 보존 없이 스무딩이 들어간 흔적이 분명하고, 입 주변과 치아도 다소 인위적으로 정리되어 자연스러운 인상이 약합니다.
杨涛428send_backneutral皮肤表面已经很干净,但这次更像是整体做了柔化,毛孔和真实肤质都被抹掉了,不符合“去压缩噪点但不磨皮”的要求。商业感和暖调还在,不过质感偏软,建议保留皮肤纹理再回一版。
田中 彩758send_backneutral肌のざらつきはかなり抑えられていて、全体はきれいです。ただ、少しつるっとしすぎて見えて、毛穴の質感を残したままノイズだけ消すという指示にはもう少し近づける余地があると思います。
María López767send_backneutralLa piel se ve bastante limpia, pero aquí se nota un poco demasiado suavizada; no termina de conservar bien los poros. Además, el cabello tiene algo de suavizado/artefacto y el look general se siente un pelín intenso.
王小明327send_backfrustrated这张还是不太对,皮肤看起来被处理得太厉害了,毛孔感几乎没了,而且脸还是有点过度修饰,不够自然。按要求是去掉压缩噪点但别磨皮,现在更像整体被柔化了,先退回去再调吧。
Turn 4 Deepen the shadows on the clothing for more editorial contrast.
5.90mean overall 5.50adherence 6.40artifact 3/7/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 4/10 조서준 (send_back)
"의도한 의상 그림자 강화는 거의 보이지 않고, 여전히 인물 피부가 과도하게 매끈해 보입니다. 입 주변과 치아도 인위적으로 정리된 느낌이 남아 있어, 에디토리얼 톤보다는 보정 흔적이 더 먼저 읽힙니다."
HIGHEST · 8/10 Emma Wilson (ship)
"The clothing shadows are deeper and give the image more editorial contrast without disturbing the face or geometry. Skin still looks natural, and the edit feels ready to go."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez888shippleasedLa modificación responde correctamente: las sombras en la ropa tienen más presencia y el contraste se siente más editorial. La identidad se mantiene intacta, y aunque persiste una ligera suavidad en rostro y cabello, no compromete el resultado final.
Kevin Taylor898shippleasedThe clothing is reading with stronger editorial contrast, and the subject’s likeness and skin tone still feel natural. The image stays clean overall, with the subject sharp enough and the background softness working well for this brief.
Sarah Johnson564send_backfrustratedThe clothing is definitely darker, but the whole image feels a bit too pushed and the face looks more edited than natural. I’d want the shadows to stay punchy without losing the skin texture or making the portrait look so smoothed out.
Mark Garcia536send_backresignedThe warm look and background blur are still working, but the clothing shadows didn’t really get deeper in a convincing way. The face is still too smoothed out and the alignment feels a bit off, so this is closer but not there yet.
Emma Wilson889shippleasedThe clothing shadows are deeper and give the image more editorial contrast without disturbing the face or geometry. Skin still looks natural, and the edit feels ready to go.
조서준454send_backfrustrated의도한 의상 그림자 강화는 거의 보이지 않고, 여전히 인물 피부가 과도하게 매끈해 보입니다. 입 주변과 치아도 인위적으로 정리된 느낌이 남아 있어, 에디토리얼 톤보다는 보정 흔적이 더 먼저 읽힙니다.
杨涛427send_backneutral服装阴影没有明显加深,编辑感的对比度还是不够。整体虽然暖调统一,但脸部和上衣都偏柔,质感被抹得太平了,不符合只压噪不磨皮的要求。
田中 彩657send_backneutral衣服の陰影は少し深まり、エディトリアルな雰囲気は出ています。ただ、肌がやや滑らかで質感が弱く、顔の自然さをもう少し残したいです。
María López765send_backneutralSí se nota más contraste en la ropa, y la vibra editorial quedó bien. Pero la piel sigue demasiado suavizada y el pelo tiene artefactos/suavizado raro, así que todavía no lo dejaría pasar.
王小明436send_backfrustrated衣服的阴影确实有加深一点,但整体还是太“磨皮”了,脸部质感丢得比较明显,毛孔和真实皮肤纹理几乎没了。现在看起来还是偏修饰过头,建议继续保留原始脸型和五官结构,只轻微调衣服对比度就好。
Turn 5 Final pass — verify the eyes and eyelashes are unchanged, do nothing else.
6.20mean overall 5.10adherence 6.70artifact 3/7/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 4/10 杨涛 (send_back)
"眼睛和睫毛看起来并没有明显改动,但这次整体又被过度柔化了,脸部和上衣的纹理都被抹平,商业修图该有的层次感不够。按要求只做最终确认的话,这张图实际上还动了其他部分,不能直接通过。"
HIGHEST · 9/10 Emma Wilson (ship)
"The eyes and eyelashes look unchanged, and the face still reads naturally. I do see a bit of softness around the hair and a slight AI-smooth feel overall, but it doesn’t disturb the main edit."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez786shippleasedThe eyes and eyelashes appear consistent, and the portrait still reads as a natural, polished wedding-style edit. There is a slight AI smoothness in the face and hair, but it does not undermine the identity or overall presentation.
Kevin Taylor989shippleasedThe eyes and lashes look consistent, and the face still holds together well. There’s a slight overall polish to the image, but nothing here reads as a break—clean result.
Sarah Johnson637send_backfrustratedThe eyes and lashes look mostly fine, but this feels more processed than a true final pass. The face is still a bit too smoothed and pushed dark, and the warm tone is stronger than I’d want for a natural result.
Mark Garcia546send_backfrustratedEyes and lashes look mostly stable, but the face is still too smoothed out and the likeness feels a little off. Warm skin and the background blur are good, but this isn’t quite ready to ship yet.
Emma Wilson998shippleasedThe eyes and eyelashes look unchanged, and the face still reads naturally. I do see a bit of softness around the hair and a slight AI-smooth feel overall, but it doesn’t disturb the main edit.
조서준534send_backfrustrated지시한 대로 눈과 속눈썹은 크게 건드린 흔적이 없어 보이지만, 전체적으로 보정이 과합니다. 피부 질감이 너무 매끈하고 입 주변과 치아도 인위적으로 정리된 느낌이 남아 있어, ‘아무것도 하지 말라’는 최종 패스 기준에는 맞지 않습니다.
杨涛438send_backfrustrated眼睛和睫毛看起来并没有明显改动,但这次整体又被过度柔化了,脸部和上衣的纹理都被抹平,商业修图该有的层次感不够。按要求只做最终确认的话,这张图实际上还动了其他部分,不能直接通过。
田中 彩748send_backneutral目元とまつげは大きく破綻していませんが、指示の「何もしない」に対しては全体の印象が少し変わって見えます。肌の質感もやや滑らかで、自然さをもう少し残したいです。
María López675send_backfrustratedLos ojos y las pestañas se ven bastante bien, pero no me convence que la piel siga tan suavizada, pierde textura natural. Además, el cabello tiene zonas raras y artefactos; para un pase final de verificación, no lo dejaría así.
王小明426send_backfrustrated眼睛和睫毛看起来还是有变化,没做到“只检查、不动别的”。而且脸还是太磨皮了,真实皮肤纹理基本没了,这个自然感还是不够。

S3_portrait_editorial_edit · GPT Image 2

base
base
turn 1
turn 1
turn 2
turn 2
turn 3
turn 3
turn 4
turn 4
turn 5
turn 5
Turn 1 Warm the skin tones slightly — do NOT alter facial geometry.
7.80mean overall 8.00adherence 8.10artifact 9/1/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 7/10 Oliver Martinez (ship)
"The skin tones are warmed subtly and naturally, and the facial structure appears unchanged. There is a polished, flattering finish overall, with only a slight risk that the warmth is a touch more pronounced than necessary for a restrained edit."
HIGHEST · 9/10 María López (ship)
"Sí, se ve más cálida la piel sin tocar la cara, justo como pediste. El resultado está limpio y natural, así que yo la daría por buena."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez788shippleasedThe skin tones are warmed subtly and naturally, and the facial structure appears unchanged. There is a polished, flattering finish overall, with only a slight risk that the warmth is a touch more pronounced than necessary for a restrained edit.
Kevin Taylor878shipneutralThe skin reads a bit warmer overall, and the facial geometry appears intact. It’s clean and commercially usable, though the warmth is subtle rather than pronounced.
Sarah Johnson898shippleasedSkin tones look a bit warmer, and that seems to fit the request nicely. I don’t see any obvious face-shape changes, so this feels like a solid edit.
Mark Garcia889shippleasedNice tweak overall — the skin reads a bit warmer without messing with her face shape. Looks clean and natural enough to post.
Emma Wilson888shippleasedThe skin tone does look a bit warmer, and the face shape appears unchanged. Overall this feels clean and polished, with only minor room for fine-tuning.
조서준898shippleased피부 톤이 확실히 조금 더 따뜻해졌고, 얼굴형은 자연스럽게 유지되었습니다. 다만 전체적으로는 보정이 다소 매끈하여 편집 사진 특유의 질감은 조금 약합니다.
杨涛768send_backneutral肤色确实偏暖了一点,但整体变化比较克制。脸部几何看起来基本没动,不过这张的笑容和五官细节有一点过于“修饰感”,还可以再自然些。
田中 彩887shippleased肌の色味が少し暖かくなっていて、自然で見やすいです。顔の形も変わっていないように見えるので、指示にはかなり合っています。
María López999shippleasedSí, se ve más cálida la piel sin tocar la cara, justo como pediste. El resultado está limpio y natural, así que yo la daría por buena.
王小明788shippleased皮肤色调确实有一点变暖,看起来还挺自然的,脸型也没明显被改动。整体效果不错,基本可以用了。
Turn 2 Blur the background a bit more; keep the subject tack-sharp.
7.30mean overall 7.80adherence 7.60artifact 7/3/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 6/10 杨涛 (send_back)
"背景确实更虚了,主体也基本保持清晰,但脸部还是有明显的精修感,笑容和牙齿细节略显不自然。肤色偏暖的问题依旧存在,建议再收一点后期味道,保持更真实的皮肤质感。"
HIGHEST · 8/10 조서준 (ship)
"배경 블러가 충분히 깊어졌고, 주 피사체의 분리도도 좋습니다. 얼굴 형태와 원본 인상은 잘 유지되었으며, 다만 질감이 약간 더 살아 있어도 좋겠습니다."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez798shipneutralThe background separation is appropriately stronger, and the subject remains convincingly sharp. I do note the skin is still a touch warm, but it stays within a polished and acceptable range without drifting into unnatural color.
Kevin Taylor898shippleasedThe background is pulled back nicely and the subject still reads sharp, which matches the brief. Skin tone stays natural enough and the face holds together well; I’d ship this.
Sarah Johnson878shippleasedNice — the subject still looks sharp enough and the background is definitely softer, so the edit does what it asked. The face shape and warm tone also still feel natural, with no obvious weird artifacts.
Mark Garcia897shippleasedYeah, this is working well — the background is nicely blurred and the subject still reads sharp and clean. The warmth is solid and the portrait feels polished enough to post, though there’s a little AI-ish smoothness in the hair/teeth if I’m being picky.
Emma Wilson898shippleasedThe background is nicely blurred and the subject stays the clear focal point. The face still looks natural and polished, with only a slight warmth to the skin that remains acceptable.
조서준898shippleased배경 블러가 충분히 깊어졌고, 주 피사체의 분리도도 좋습니다. 얼굴 형태와 원본 인상은 잘 유지되었으며, 다만 질감이 약간 더 살아 있어도 좋겠습니다.
杨涛676send_backneutral背景确实更虚了,主体也基本保持清晰,但脸部还是有明显的精修感,笑容和牙齿细节略显不自然。肤色偏暖的问题依旧存在,建议再收一点后期味道,保持更真实的皮肤质感。
田中 彩657send_backneutral背景はしっかりぼけていますが、被写体の目元や髪の一部に少し柔らかさがあり、タックシャープという点はもう少し欲しいです。雰囲気は自然で見やすいので、全体としては悪くありませんが、もう少し被写体の輪郭をきっちり出したいです。
María López788shippleasedSí, el fondo se ve más desenfocado y la cara sigue nítida, que era lo importante. Se mantiene limpio y natural, aunque el pelo suelto del lado derecho ya roza un poco lo llamativo.
王小明768send_backneutral背景确实更糊了,主体也还算清楚,但脸部锐度没有特别“钉住”,看起来还是有点柔。整体效果不错,不过如果能让人像再更清晰一点就更稳了。
Turn 3 Remove any compression noise on the skin without smoothing pores.
6.60mean overall 5.70adherence 7.60artifact 5/5/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 4/10 杨涛 (send_back)
"皮肤表面噪点和质感基本是干净了,但已经明显偏向磨皮后的商业修图感,不符合“去压缩噪点但不抹掉毛孔”的要求。面部高光和肤色也有点过暖,整体仍然保留了较强的后期味道。"
HIGHEST · 8/10 조서준 (ship)
"피부의 압축 노이즈는 상당히 잘 정리되었고, 모공 질감도 과하게 뭉개지지 않아 자연스러운 인상이 유지되었습니다. 얼굴 형태와 원본의 인상도 안정적으로 보이며, 배경 분리 역시 충분히 좋아졌습니다. 다만 전반적으로 약간 매끈한 편이라, 질감은 현재 수준에서만 더 보수적으로 유지하는 편이 좋겠습니다."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez657send_backneutralThe skin is cleaner, but the edit has gone too far toward a softened, polished look rather than preserving natural pore structure. The warmth is still acceptable, though the facial detail feels slightly over-processed and the identity should remain a touch more grounded.
Kevin Taylor768shippleasedThe skin is clean overall and the pores are still present, so the retouching reads commercially usable. I do see a slightly over-smoothed, polished look in places, but nothing major is broken and the portrait still holds up.
Sarah Johnson889shippleasedLooks really good overall — the skin still keeps a natural texture, and I’m not seeing obvious pore-smearing or weird artifacts. The warm tone and face shape also feel preserved, so this feels ready to ship.
Mark Garcia647send_backneutralThe skin does look cleaner, but it went a bit too far and now feels slightly smoothed out instead of just de-noised. I’d want a little more pore texture back, plus the teeth and hair still read a touch AI-ish.
Emma Wilson778shipneutralThe skin looks clean and the pores are still visible, so the edit respects the brief. I do see a bit of overall warmth in the face, but it still feels natural and the portrait remains strong.
조서준887shippleased피부의 압축 노이즈는 상당히 잘 정리되었고, 모공 질감도 과하게 뭉개지지 않아 자연스러운 인상이 유지되었습니다. 얼굴 형태와 원본의 인상도 안정적으로 보이며, 배경 분리 역시 충분히 좋아졌습니다. 다만 전반적으로 약간 매끈한 편이라, 질감은 현재 수준에서만 더 보수적으로 유지하는 편이 좋겠습니다.
杨涛438send_backneutral皮肤表面噪点和质感基本是干净了,但已经明显偏向磨皮后的商业修图感,不符合“去压缩噪点但不抹掉毛孔”的要求。面部高光和肤色也有点过暖,整体仍然保留了较强的后期味道。
田中 彩656send_backneutral肌のざらつきはかなり抑えられていますが、少しのっぺりしていて毛穴感が弱いです。顔立ちや雰囲気は自然ですが、もう少し肌の質感を残しつつ、輪郭や目元のシャープさも整えるとより良くなります。
María López778shippleasedSe ve limpio y natural, y la cara sigue bien nítida. Sí noto que el pelo suelto del lado derecho llama bastante la atención, pero en general ya cumple bastante bien.
王小明748send_backneutral整体观感还不错,脸部也挺干净,但这张更像是把皮肤磨得很顺,毛孔感没保住,和“去掉压缩噪点但不要抹平毛孔”不太一致。人物表情和背景都可以,不过脸还是有点偏柔,没完全把质感钉住。
Turn 4 Deepen the shadows on the clothing for more editorial contrast.
6.60mean overall 6.60adherence 6.90artifact 4/6/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 5/10 Mark Garcia (send_back)
"The clothing is definitely darker, but the edit pushed the face way too smooth and a bit plastic, which hurts the natural look. Hair and teeth also feel a little AI-ish, so this isn’t quite post-ready for me."
HIGHEST · 8/10 María López (ship)
"Se ve muy bien: la ropa tiene más contraste y sigue viéndose natural, sin romper el look cálido. La cara está nítida y el fondo sigue bien desenfocado; solo el pelo suelto de la derecha llama un poquito la atención, pero no molesta demasiado."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez685send_backneutralThe clothing shadows have been deepened, but the result is still too processed for my taste. The face and skin read a bit over-smoothed with a warm cast that pushes the portrait away from a natural, polished finish, and the facial detail could be grounded more realistically.
Kevin Taylor787shippleasedThe clothing shadows are deeper and the editorial contrast is working. Skin texture still reads reasonably well, though there’s a slightly polished AI look and the teeth/lip area feels a touch overcooked.
Sarah Johnson788shippleasedNice improvement — the clothing shadows are deeper and give it a bit more editorial punch. The warm tone and natural face shape still look good, and I’m not seeing any obvious weird artifacts.
Mark Garcia535send_backfrustratedThe clothing is definitely darker, but the edit pushed the face way too smooth and a bit plastic, which hurts the natural look. Hair and teeth also feel a little AI-ish, so this isn’t quite post-ready for me.
Emma Wilson677send_backneutralThe clothing is darker and does add a bit more contrast, but the edit feels heavier overall than the previous natural look. The face still reads well, though the warmth and retouching make it feel a little less realistic than before.
조서준767send_backneutral의도한 의상 대비는 어느 정도 살아났지만, 실제로는 전체적으로 다소 매끈하게 정리되어 의상 그림자의 깊이가 기대만큼 강하지 않습니다. 얼굴 인상과 배경 분리는 유지되었으나, 피부와 헤어 쪽의 편집 티가 조금 더 보수적으로 관리되면 좋겠습니다.
杨涛647send_backneutral服装阴影没有明显加深,整件衣服还是偏平,编辑对比感不足。脸部依旧有明显精修和暖色偏移,笑容与牙齿也不够自然,建议继续往真实质感收。
田中 彩767send_backneutral衣服の陰影は少し深くなっていて、編集の方向性は合っています。ただ、全体にやや滑らかで、肌や髪の質感が少し弱く見えます。
María López889shippleasedSe ve muy bien: la ropa tiene más contraste y sigue viéndose natural, sin romper el look cálido. La cara está nítida y el fondo sigue bien desenfocado; solo el pelo suelto de la derecha llama un poquito la atención, pero no molesta demasiado.
王小明787shippleased衣服的阴影确实压下来了,整体更有一点 editorial 的感觉,目标有做到。脸还算稳,表情也很自然,不过皮肤还是偏顺了一点,质感没有完全钉住。
Turn 5 Final pass — verify the eyes and eyelashes are unchanged, do nothing else.
4.70mean overall 2.60adherence 4.40artifact 0/10/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 4/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The eyes and lashes do not feel unchanged; the eye area appears softened and altered, which violates the instruction. The portrait is also pushed too warm and processed overall, with visible smoothing that compromises natural facial detail."
HIGHEST · 7/10 María López (send_back)
"Los ojos y las pestañas se ven bastante consistentes, pero el pelo del lado derecho sigue llamando mucho la atención y la piel tiene un aspecto algo raro/texturizado. La foto va bien de luz y fondo, pero yo la devolvería por ese detalle antes de entregarla."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez425send_backfrustratedThe eyes and lashes do not feel unchanged; the eye area appears softened and altered, which violates the instruction. The portrait is also pushed too warm and processed overall, with visible smoothing that compromises natural facial detail.
Kevin Taylor635send_backneutralThe eyes and lashes don’t appear catastrophically altered, but this is not a true no-op pass. The mouth area is still overworked and the skin reads noticeably polished, so I’d send it back for a stricter preserve-only edit.
Sarah Johnson525send_backfrustratedThe eyes and lashes don’t look unchanged to me, and the face feels a bit too edited compared to the last good version. The warmth is nice, but there are some obvious artifacts and the skin looks a little unnatural.
Mark Garcia434send_backfrustratedThis doesn’t feel like a true final pass—there’s still that over-smoothed, plastic look on the face, and the eyes/eyelashes don’t read as untouched to me. The teeth and hair also feel a bit AI-ish, so I’d send it back.
Emma Wilson434send_backfrustratedThe eyes do not look unchanged, and the overall face feels altered and overprocessed. The skin texture and smile also read too artificial for a final pass that was supposed to do nothing else.
조서준423send_backfrustrated눈과 속눈썹의 형태가 원본 유지인지 신뢰하기 어렵고, 전반적으로 보정 흔적이 과하게 느껴집니다. 피부와 헤어 질감이 많이 매끈해져 편집 티가 강하며, 지시한 ‘do nothing else’ 기준에도 맞지 않습니다.
杨涛423send_backfrustrated眼睛和睫毛已经被明显重做,不是“保持不变”的状态;整张图还有很重的商业修图感,皮肤和牙齿都过度处理。这个阶段不只是没做对,还偏离了“只检查、不做其他修改”的要求。
田中 彩425send_backfrustrated目元とまつ毛は大きく崩れていないように見えますが、全体にかなり滑らかで、肌質や髪の質感が弱くなっています。指示は「何もしない」確認なので、ここまでの変化が見えるのは少し不安です。
María López746send_backneutralLos ojos y las pestañas se ven bastante consistentes, pero el pelo del lado derecho sigue llamando mucho la atención y la piel tiene un aspecto algo raro/texturizado. La foto va bien de luz y fondo, pero yo la devolvería por ese detalle antes de entregarla.
王小明534send_backfrustrated眼睛和睫毛看起来不像“完全没动”,有点被重新处理过了。脸部也太顺了,质感被抹平,和前面要保留的自然皮肤状态不太一致。

S4_text_poster_iterative_edit · Nano Banana Pro

base
base
turn 1
turn 1
turn 2
turn 2
turn 3
turn 3
turn 4
turn 4
turn 5
turn 5
Turn 1 Keep all non-text elements (coffee shop interior, chairs, tables, menu boards, ceiling, floor, lighting, people) exactly as they are.
2.40mean overall 1.50adherence 7.20artifact 0/9/1ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 2/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The edit fails the brief: the main signage text was not preserved, and the shop name has been replaced with different wording. The rest of the interior is largely intact, but the core text-change request was not followed."
HIGHEST · 3/10 María López (send_back)
"No respeta bien la instrucción: cambió el letrero principal, pero también alteró otros textos y la fachada del café. Además, el nombre nuevo se ve raro y no mantiene fielmente el resto de la escena."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez218send_backfrustratedThe edit fails the brief: the main signage text was not preserved, and the shop name has been replaced with different wording. The rest of the interior is largely intact, but the core text-change request was not followed.
Kevin Taylor227send_backfrustratedThe sign text has been changed, but so much else drifted that this no longer preserves the original interior. The logo area, menu boards, and overall scene feel substantially altered rather than just the shop-name signage.
Sarah Johnson217send_backfrustratedThe main sign text was changed, but a lot more got altered too — the shop name, the menu boards, and the overall look don’t match the seed anymore. This breaks the keep-everything-else-unchanged instruction pretty hard.
Mark Garcia327send_backfrustratedWay off from the brief — it changed the shop name to "DAILY GRIND CAFE" instead of only editing the main signage text. The rest of the interior is mostly intact, but because the key text target is wrong, this needs another pass.
Emma Wilson328send_backfrustratedThe main sign text was changed, but so much else shifted that it no longer matches the original scene. The café branding, menu boards, and overall interior details were altered when they should have stayed exactly the same.
조서준327send_backfrustrated주요 간판의 텍스트를 원하는 방향으로 정확히 수정하지 못했고, ‘STIR COFFEE CO.’가 다른 상호명으로 바뀌어 브리프를 벗어났습니다. 또한 메뉴판과 일부 디테일의 질감이 다소 뭉개져 있어, 비텍스트 요소를 그대로 유지해야 하는 조건을 충분히 만족하지 못했습니다.
杨涛217send_backfrustrated这次改动明显跑偏了,不只是更换主招牌文字,连店名墙面、菜单板文字和整体标识都被改了,已经破坏了保留不变的要求。画面本身还算干净,但任务完成度很低,不能接受。
田中 彩217abandonfrustrated看板の文字だけでなく、店名ロゴや全体の雰囲気まで大きく変わってしまっています。内装や人の配置は概ね保たれていますが、元の『STIR COFFEE CO.』からの改変が大きすぎて、この指示には合っていません。
María López327send_backfrustratedNo respeta bien la instrucción: cambió el letrero principal, pero también alteró otros textos y la fachada del café. Además, el nombre nuevo se ve raro y no mantiene fielmente el resto de la escena.
王小明217send_backfrustrated這次改得太多了,不只是招牌文字,連店名、黑板內容、整體色調都變了。雖然畫面還算乾淨,但完全不符合只改文字、其他都要保持不變的要求。
Turn 2 Change only the main shop-name signage text that currently reads 'STIR COFFEE CO.' — replace it with 'STUDIO VIVID'. Match the original font weight and color.
3.60mean overall 2.90adherence 7.60artifact 2/7/1ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 2/10 Oliver Martinez (abandon)
"The main signage text was not preserved as a simple replacement; it has been moved and restyled into a different wall logo treatment. This fails the brief, which required only changing the existing shop-name text while keeping the rest of the scene unchanged."
HIGHEST · 9/10 Sarah Johnson (ship)
"Nice — the main sign text is changed to STUDIO VIVID and the rest of the scene looks basically preserved. I don’t see any major unwanted edits, and the lettering style feels pretty close."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez217abandonfrustratedThe main signage text was not preserved as a simple replacement; it has been moved and restyled into a different wall logo treatment. This fails the brief, which required only changing the existing shop-name text while keeping the rest of the scene unchanged.
Kevin Taylor227send_backfrustratedThe signage text was changed, but the edit drifted far beyond the requested area and altered the overall scene. This breaks the brief’s preserve-everything-else constraint, so it needs to be redone with tighter isolation.
Sarah Johnson998shippleasedNice — the main sign text is changed to STUDIO VIVID and the rest of the scene looks basically preserved. I don’t see any major unwanted edits, and the lettering style feels pretty close.
Mark Garcia218send_backfrustratedYeah, this missed the brief pretty hard — the main sign text is not preserved correctly, and it got changed to the wrong shop name again. The rest of the interior is mostly intact, but the signage replacement needs to match 'STUDIO VIVID' exactly.
Emma Wilson327send_backfrustratedThe main sign text was changed, but too many surrounding details drifted from the original café interior. The menu boards, wall layout, and overall scene no longer match the seed closely enough for a clean edit.
조서준327send_backfrustrated주요 간판 텍스트는 ‘STUDIO VIVID’로 바뀌었지만, 기존의 컵/숟가락 아이콘과 벽면 레이아웃까지 함께 변형되어 원본 보존이 크게 깨졌습니다. 상단 메뉴판의 질감과 문자도 뭉개져 있어, 이번 브리프의 ‘다른 요소는 그대로 유지’ 조건을 충족하지 못합니다.
杨涛328send_backfrustrated只改了左侧墙面店名,但这次把原本的主招牌/菜单板文字也整体改动了,明显违反了“其他元素保持不变”的要求。画面本身比较干净,但任务核心是保留原店内标识与菜单信息,这一点没有做到。
田中 彩889shippleased看板の文字は『STUDIO VIVID』に変更されており、店内の雰囲気や配置も概ね保たれています。文字の白さと太さも元の印象に近く、仕上がりはきれいです。
María López217send_backfrustratedSe cambió el rótulo principal, pero también se alteró demasiado la fachada y varios textos del fondo. El nuevo nombre se ve raro y no respeta bien la escena original ni la instrucción de dejar todo lo demás igual.
王小明218send_backfrustrated這版改太多了,不只招牌文字,整體黑板內容、字型感、甚至店內細節都被動到,已經不符合『只改招牌』的要求。雖然畫面看起來算乾淨,但保留原圖元素這件事沒有做到。
Turn 3 Make the new 'STUDIO VIVID' text sharper — no drop shadow, no glow effects.
2.80mean overall 1.90adherence 6.80artifact 0/8/2ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 2/10 Oliver Martinez (abandon)
"The edit has not preserved the original scene; it has replaced the shop identity and altered the wall treatment rather than making a simple text change. The requested lettering is also not rendered as sharp, clean signage, and the result departs materially fro"
HIGHEST · 5/10 田中 彩 (send_back)
"看板文字の差し替え自体はできていますが、元の店名ロゴの雰囲気が大きく変わってしまい、全体の一体感も少し崩れています。今回の指示どおり、文字はよりシャープでも、ロゴや空間はもっと元の写真に近く保ってほしいです。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez216abandonfrustratedThe edit has not preserved the original scene; it has replaced the shop identity and altered the wall treatment rather than making a simple text change. The requested lettering is also not rendered as sharp, clean signage, and the result departs materially from the seed.
Kevin Taylor327send_backfrustratedThe sign text change is not isolated; the model has drifted well beyond the original branding area and altered the whole left wall presentation. The new lettering is also not especially sharp, and the added styling reads more like a graphic replacement than a clean text edit.
Sarah Johnson326send_backfrustratedIt missed the main ask pretty badly — the sign text wasn’t just sharpened, it changed the whole shop name area and pulled the eye away from the original scene. The rest of the café also drifted enough that this doesn’t feel like a clean preserve-and-edit.
Mark Garcia217send_backfrustratedStill way off — the main sign text is wrong again. The scene is mostly preserved, but the edit ignored the exact 'STUDIO VIVID' requirement and the lettering is not sharp.
Emma Wilson327send_backfrustratedThe sign text was changed, but the edit drifted badly from the seed and replaced the original café branding with a very different layout and typography. It also did not follow the instruction to make the text sharper without shadow or glow.
조서준217send_backfrustrated주요 간판 텍스트 변경은 됐지만, 이번 지시는 글자를 더 선명하게 하라는 것이었습니다. 그러나 드롭 섀도와 글로우가 여전히 보이고, 컵/숟가락 아이콘과 메뉴판 레이아웃까지 크게 변형되어 원본 보존에 실패했습니다.
杨涛328send_backfrustrated这次虽然把店名改成了 STUDIO VIVID,但明显误改了招牌位置与整块墙面布局,连上方菜单板文字也被重做了,不符合“只改主店名、其余保持不变”的要求。文字本身也不够利落,和“更锐利、不要阴影/发光”的指令还有差距。
田中 彩557send_backneutral看板文字の差し替え自体はできていますが、元の店名ロゴの雰囲気が大きく変わってしまい、全体の一体感も少し崩れています。今回の指示どおり、文字はよりシャープでも、ロゴや空間はもっと元の写真に近く保ってほしいです。
María López326send_backfrustratedCambió demasiado la fachada y hasta los carteles del fondo, no solo el rótulo principal. Además, el nuevo texto no se ve especialmente más nítido y sigue sintiéndose raro en la escena.
王小明217abandonfrustrated又改太多了,整個招牌、黑板內容跟店內氛圍都被換掉了,跟要求只改主招牌文字差很多。文字雖然變成 STUDIO VIVID,但不是單純把原本內容替換乾淨,這版不合格。
Turn 4 Double-check the interior is unchanged — no recoloring of walls, no repositioning of furniture, menu boards must remain untouched.
2.20mean overall 1.30adherence 6.40artifact 0/10/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 2/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The shop identity has been altered beyond the requested text swap, and the menu boards appear changed as well. The interior is not preserved cleanly; this needs to be redone with the scene, walls, furniture, and boards left untouched."
HIGHEST · 3/10 María López (send_back)
"No está bien: cambiaron demasiado la escena, sobre todo el texto de los menús y el rótulo quedó más grande y raro. También se nota la imagen más lavada y no respeta que solo se modificara el nombre principal."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez216send_backfrustratedThe shop identity has been altered beyond the requested text swap, and the menu boards appear changed as well. The interior is not preserved cleanly; this needs to be redone with the scene, walls, furniture, and boards left untouched.
Kevin Taylor215send_backfrustratedThe edit has drifted well beyond the signage: the menu boards are visibly altered, the wall tone and interior balance have changed, and the scene no longer matches the seed. This misses the core requirement of preserving the shop interior and only updating the main name mark.
Sarah Johnson217send_backfrustratedYikes, this changed way more than the sign text. The wall color, menu boards, and overall interior look all drifted, so it doesn’t match the brief at all.
Mark Garcia227send_backfrustratedThe sign text is still wrong — it says STIR COFFEE CO. instead of the requested change, so that’s a miss. Also the interior didn’t stay fully unchanged: the menu boards and overall wall tone look altered, so this needs another pass.
Emma Wilson326send_backfrustratedThe sign text was changed, but the edit drifted badly from the seed: the wall tone, menu boards, and overall interior look are noticeably altered. This breaks the instruction to keep the café unchanged aside from the main sign text.
조서준216send_backfrustrated주요 간판 텍스트는 반영되었지만, 이번 턴의 핵심인 실내 보존이 크게 무너졌습니다. 벽면 톤이 달라졌고 메뉴보드와 전체 명암도 원본과 다르게 변형되어 있어, 편집 기준을 충족하지 못합니다.
杨涛217send_backfrustrated整体内饰被明显重做了:墙面颜色、前台、菜单板和招牌都发生了变化,完全没有满足“其余保持不变”的要求。当前结果偏离严重,不能使用。
田中 彩217send_backfrustrated看板の文字だけでなく、全体の色味や壁の印象がかなり変わってしまっています。メニューボードも元写真と一致しておらず、店内の一体感が崩れて見えます。
María López326send_backfrustratedNo está bien: cambiaron demasiado la escena, sobre todo el texto de los menús y el rótulo quedó más grande y raro. También se nota la imagen más lavada y no respeta que solo se modificara el nombre principal.
王小明217send_backfrustrated這版改太多了,招牌文字雖然有換,但黑板內容、牆面色調跟整體氛圍也都被動到,跟要求不符。店內其他元素本來應該完全不變,這次沒有守住。
Turn 5 Final pass — the image must look like the original coffee-shop photo with only the shop-name signage text changed.
1.90mean overall 1.00adherence 5.50artifact 0/8/2ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 1/10 杨涛 (send_back)
"严重跑偏了:店名被改成了“THE DAILY GRIND”,而且整面墙、菜单板和前台都被重做,完全没有保持原图结构。画面还有明显的过度锐化和处理痕迹,不能作为最终稿。"
HIGHEST · 2/10 王小明 (send_back)
"這次改太多了,整個店名、黑板內容和牆面氛圍都變掉,完全不是只改主招牌文字。雖然畫面還算乾淨,但跟原圖的保留要求差太遠,不能收。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez215send_backfrustratedThe edit has drifted far from the source: the shop name, menu boards, and overall interior identity have all been altered instead of preserving the original scene. This is not a clean text-only signage replacement, and the result does not meet the brief.
Kevin Taylor215send_backfrustratedThe edit drifts far beyond the sign: the shop name, menu boards, wall tone, and overall interior balance have all changed. The new lettering is clean enough, but it does not preserve the original photo, so this misses the brief badly.
Sarah Johnson216abandonfrustratedThis drifted way too far from the seed. The main shop text changed, but it also rewrote the whole café name, the menu boards, and a bunch of interior details, so it doesn’t meet the “only the signage text” requirement at all.
Mark Garcia216send_backfrustratedNot close — the shop name changed to THE DAILY GRIND, and the menu boards plus wall tone drifted a lot from the original. This needs to preserve the whole interior and only swap the main sign text.
Emma Wilson216send_backfrustratedThe café branding has drifted far from the seed, with the main sign changed to THE DAILY GRIND and other menu/menu-board styling also altered. This is not a final pass on the original photo; it needs to keep everything else unchanged and only update the shop-name text.
조서준216send_backfrustrated주요 간판 텍스트가 원본과 전혀 다르게 바뀌었고, 상호명만 수정해야 한다는 지시를 크게 위반했습니다. 실내 구조와 질감도 원본 보존이 충분하지 않아 편집 기준에 맞지 않습니다.
杨涛114send_backfrustrated严重跑偏了:店名被改成了“THE DAILY GRIND”,而且整面墙、菜单板和前台都被重做,完全没有保持原图结构。画面还有明显的过度锐化和处理痕迹,不能作为最终稿。
田中 彩216abandonfrustrated看板文字だけの差し替えではなく、店名ロゴが『THE DAILY GRIND』に大きく変わってしまっていて、元写真の雰囲気が保てていません。さらに全体の色味や質感もかなりずれており、今回の最終条件には合っていないです。
María López216send_backfrustratedNo, esto se fue demasiado: cambió el rótulo principal, pero también alteró muchísimo el estilo general y dejó la foto más lavada. Ya no se ve como la imagen original de la cafetería, así que no cumple con preservar todo lo demás.
王小明215send_backfrustrated這次改太多了,整個店名、黑板內容和牆面氛圍都變掉,完全不是只改主招牌文字。雖然畫面還算乾淨,但跟原圖的保留要求差太遠,不能收。

S4_text_poster_iterative_edit · GPT Image 2

base
base
turn 1
turn 1
turn 2
turn 2
turn 3
turn 3
turn 4
turn 4
turn 5
turn 5
Turn 1 Keep all non-text elements (coffee shop interior, chairs, tables, menu boards, ceiling, floor, lighting, people) exactly as they are.
2.40mean overall 1.60adherence 7.90artifact 0/10/0ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 2/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The signage edit is incomplete and incorrect: only “STIR” remains, while “COFFEE CO.” has been removed rather than preserved or replaced as requested. The rest of the interior is largely intact, but this fails the brief’s core requirement to modify only the ma"
HIGHEST · 4/10 María López (send_back)
"No quedó bien: cambió el letrero principal, pero ahora solo dice “STIR” y se perdió “COFFEE CO.”. Además, se mantuvo casi todo lo demás, pero el cambio de texto no cumple con el objetivo exacto."
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez218send_backfrustratedThe signage edit is incomplete and incorrect: only “STIR” remains, while “COFFEE CO.” has been removed rather than preserved or replaced as requested. The rest of the interior is largely intact, but this fails the brief’s core requirement to modify only the main shop-name text.
Kevin Taylor228send_backfrustratedThe signage edit is incomplete and wrong: it only reads “STIR,” not the full shop name, so the core brief is missed. The rest of the interior is largely preserved and the image is clean, but this needs a proper text-only correction.
Sarah Johnson218send_backfrustratedIt changed way more than the sign text — the whole shop name area was altered and the left wall branding is now incomplete. The interior itself looks clean, but this misses the keep-everything-else-unchanged instruction pretty hard.
Mark Garcia327send_backfrustratedThe main sign text got changed, but it only says “STIR” now, so the shop name is incomplete. A bunch of the other menu text also looks altered, and the rest of the scene should have stayed exactly the same.
Emma Wilson228send_backfrustratedThe sign text was not fully preserved as requested; it looks like only part of the shop name remains. The rest of the cafe is mostly intact, but this misses the main text edit goal.
조서준218send_backfrustrated간판 텍스트만 수정해야 하는데, 현재 결과는 ‘STIR COFFEE CO.’의 나머지 글자가 통째로 사라져 의도와 크게 어긋납니다. 실내 요소는 대체로 유지되었으나, 핵심 대상인 상호 표기가 보존되지 않아 재작업이 필요합니다.
杨涛218send_backfrustrated只改了左侧招牌文字的一部分,原本的“STIR COFFEE CO.”被删掉大半,明显不符合只替换店招文本的要求。其余环境虽然基本保留,但这次文字修改方向错误,需重做。
田中 彩218send_backfrustrated看板以外の店内要素はほぼ保たれていますが、依頼した店名テキストが『STIR COFFEE CO.』ではなく『STIR』だけに変わっており、重要な指示に合っていません。見た目は比較的きれいですが、編集内容としては不十分です。
María López438send_backfrustratedNo quedó bien: cambió el letrero principal, pero ahora solo dice “STIR” y se perdió “COFFEE CO.”. Además, se mantuvo casi todo lo demás, pero el cambio de texto no cumple con el objetivo exacto.
王小明328send_backfrustrated這張把招牌文字改掉了,但不只改文字,左邊整個標誌區和字樣比例也變了,和原圖不太一致。其他咖啡店內部大致保留得不錯,畫面也算乾淨,但就這個任務來說還是不夠準。
Turn 2 Change only the main shop-name signage text that currently reads 'STIR COFFEE CO.' — replace it with 'STUDIO VIVID'. Match the original font weight and color.
4.10mean overall 3.30adherence 8.00artifact 2/7/1ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 2/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The shop name was replaced incorrectly: it now reads “STUDIO VIVID” on the left wall, but the instruction required changing only the main shop-name signage. The rest of the interior is largely preserved and technically clean, but the edit missed the intended s"
HIGHEST · 8/10 田中 彩 (ship)
"看板の文字が『STUDIO VIVID』に正しく置き換わっており、店内の雰囲気や他の要素もよく保たれています。文字のサイズ感と色味も自然で、仕上がりはかなり良いです。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez218send_backfrustratedThe shop name was replaced incorrectly: it now reads “STUDIO VIVID” on the left wall, but the instruction required changing only the main shop-name signage. The rest of the interior is largely preserved and technically clean, but the edit missed the intended sign entirely.
Kevin Taylor438send_backfrustratedThe sign text has been changed, but it is not a clean text-only correction: the logo and lettering treatment are now different, and the original coffee-shop branding has been replaced rather than matched. The rest of the interior is mostly preserved, but this misses the brief on exact signage replacement.
Sarah Johnson218send_backfrustratedThis missed the brief pretty badly — it changed the left-wall branding too, not just the main shop sign. The new text is there, but the extra redesign makes it fail the preserve-everything-else requirement.
Mark Garcia428send_backfrustratedThe new sign text is there, but it changed way more than asked — the menu boards and a bunch of the scene got altered too. It looks clean, but the edit missed the main requirement of keeping everything else unchanged.
Emma Wilson889shipneutralThe sign text has been changed to STUDIO VIVID and the rest of the cafe scene is largely preserved. I don’t see obvious technical artifacts, and the lettering matches the original weight and color well enough.
조서준658send_backfrustrated간판 문구를 ‘STUDIO VIVID’로 바꾼 점은 반영되었으나, 원본의 ‘STIR COFFEE CO.’ 형상과 배치가 완전히 보존되지 않았습니다. 특히 로고와 주변 벽면의 질감, 좌측 영역이 함께 크게 변형되어 편집 범위를 벗어났습니다.
杨涛217abandonfrustrated这版把左侧原有店招区域大幅重做成了“STUDIO VIVID”,但并没有只替换文字,连图标、版式和周边墙面关系都被改掉了。对照原图,构图与店内环境的保留明显不达标,属于严重偏离需求。
田中 彩899shippleased看板の文字が『STUDIO VIVID』に正しく置き換わっており、店内の雰囲気や他の要素もよく保たれています。文字のサイズ感と色味も自然で、仕上がりはかなり良いです。
María López327send_backfrustratedNo está bien: cambió el rótulo principal, pero ya no dice exactamente “STUDIO VIVID” y además alteró la composición del letrero de la izquierda. El resto de la cafetería se ve bastante limpio, pero hay que corregir el texto y dejar todo lo demás igual.
王小明218send_backfrustrated文字雖然有改成 STUDIO VIVID,但整個招牌區塊的比例、位置和字型結構都跟原圖差很多,已經不是只改字了。其他室內元素大致還行,但這次最重要的標誌保留沒做好,得重做。
Turn 3 Make the new 'STUDIO VIVID' text sharper — no drop shadow, no glow effects.
2.70mean overall 1.70adherence 7.90artifact 0/7/3ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 1/10 杨涛 (abandon)
"这次仍然没有遵守“只改店招文字”的要求,左侧招牌被整体重做成了 STIR COFFEE CO.,完全偏离当前要做的 STUDIO VIVID 微调。虽然画面整体比较干净,但任务方向错误,不能继续送审。"
HIGHEST · 5/10 王小明 (send_back)
"這版字有變清楚一點,但招牌區還是被改得太多了,比例和版面位置跟原圖不太一樣。這次要求是只把 STUDIO VIVID 文字變銳利、不要陰影和光暈,但整體標識外觀還是沒有保住。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez218send_backfrustratedThe edit is still on the wrong sign area and the requested “STUDIO VIVID” text is not present. While the image is technically clean, it fails the core brief of changing only the intended main shop-name signage and nothing else.
Kevin Taylor217send_backfrustratedThe sign has been changed, but not to the requested text, and the styling is not a clean text-only correction. The rest of the café is mostly intact, but this misses the brief and the lettering still reads as a different brand treatment.
Sarah Johnson218send_backfrustratedThis is way off the brief. The main sign text wasn’t changed to STUDIO VIVID, and the edit also seems to have pushed changes into the surrounding branding and wall look instead of keeping everything else untouched.
Mark Garcia428send_backfrustratedThe sign text is still wrong — it says STIR COFFEE CO., not STUDIO VIVID. Also the edit changed a bunch of other scene details, like the menu boards and overall look, instead of just sharpening the text.
Emma Wilson439send_backfrustratedThe edit is clean, but it missed the requested text change: the sign still says “STIR COFFEE CO.” instead of “STUDIO VIVID.” The sharpness requirement is also not enough to recover this, since the main signage content was not updated.
조서준217abandonfrustrated간판 문구가 ‘STUDIO VIVID’로 바뀌지 않았고, 요청한 텍스트 수정도 전혀 반영되지 않았습니다. 또한 주변 실내 요소까지 과도하게 달라져 원본 보존 기준을 크게 벗어났습니다.
杨涛118abandonfrustrated这次仍然没有遵守“只改店招文字”的要求,左侧招牌被整体重做成了 STIR COFFEE CO.,完全偏离当前要做的 STUDIO VIVID 微调。虽然画面整体比较干净,但任务方向错误,不能继续送审。
田中 彩218abandonfrustrated看板の文字が『STUDIO VIVID』ではなく『STIR COFFEE CO.』のままで、今回の指示に全く合っていません。店内の見た目はきれいですが、最重要の文字修正が反映されていないため、この結果は受け入れられません。
María López328send_backfrustratedOtra vez no: el rótulo principal sigue diciendo “STIR COFFEE CO.” en vez de “STUDIO VIVID”, así que no cumple el pedido. Además, el texto del cartel izquierdo se ha alterado bastante; la imagen está limpia, pero no respeta la edición solicitada.
王小明548send_backfrustrated這版字有變清楚一點,但招牌區還是被改得太多了,比例和版面位置跟原圖不太一樣。這次要求是只把 STUDIO VIVID 文字變銳利、不要陰影和光暈,但整體標識外觀還是沒有保住。
Turn 4 Double-check the interior is unchanged — no recoloring of walls, no repositioning of furniture, menu boards must remain untouched.
2.40mean overall 1.40adherence 7.20artifact 0/7/3ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 2/10 Oliver Martinez (send_back)
"The edit has changed the wrong area again: the main sign now reads “STIR & SIP COFFEE CO.” and the menu boards appear altered as well. The interior should have remained unchanged apart from the specified shop-name text, so this does not meet the brief."
HIGHEST · 4/10 田中 彩 (send_back)
"店内の雰囲気自体は自然ですが、看板文字がまだ『STIR COFFEE CO.』のままで、さらに『& SIP』の追加が入っており、指示と一致していません。メニューボードや壁面、家具配置も完全保持という条件から見ると、全体の変更が大きすぎます。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez217send_backfrustratedThe edit has changed the wrong area again: the main sign now reads “STIR & SIP COFFEE CO.” and the menu boards appear altered as well. The interior should have remained unchanged apart from the specified shop-name text, so this does not meet the brief.
Kevin Taylor327send_backfrustratedThe interior has drifted too far: the wall treatment, floor tone, and overall lighting all look altered, and the main sign now reads a different brand. The menu boards and general room layout should have stayed untouched, so this misses the brief.
Sarah Johnson218send_backfrustratedThe main sign text was changed, but way too much else shifted. The wall branding, menu boards, floor look, and overall interior styling are not preserved, so this misses the brief pretty hard.
Mark Garcia217send_backfrustratedWay too much got changed here — the wall color, signage, and even the interior vibe are all off from the seed. The main shop text is closer, but the menu boards were definitely altered, so this doesn’t respect the brief.
Emma Wilson228send_backfrustratedThe main sign text was changed, but the interior was not preserved cleanly: the wall tones, floor appearance, and overall lighting look altered. The menu boards also appear affected, so this misses the instruction to keep the cafe unchanged.
조서준217abandonfrustrated간판 문구가 ‘STIR & SIP COFFEE CO.’로 바뀌어 요청한 ‘STUDIO VIVID’가 반영되지 않았고, 메뉴 보드와 실내 구성이 원본과 다르게 변형되었습니다. 벽면 톤, 바 카운터, 바닥 질감까지 크게 달라져 편집 범위를 완전히 벗어났습니다.
杨涛216abandonfrustrated这次偏离很大:左侧招牌被重做成“STIR & SIP COFFEE CO.”,而且菜单板、墙面和整体室内观感也有明显改动,不符合只改店招文字的要求。构图虽然还在,但保留原场景的原则基本没有守住。
田中 彩427send_backfrustrated店内の雰囲気自体は自然ですが、看板文字がまだ『STIR COFFEE CO.』のままで、さらに『& SIP』の追加が入っており、指示と一致していません。メニューボードや壁面、家具配置も完全保持という条件から見ると、全体の変更が大きすぎます。
María López328send_backfrustratedLa imagen está limpia, pero no cumple: cambiaron demasiado el interior y el rótulo principal sigue sin decir exactamente “STUDIO VIVID”. Además, los menús de la pared también se han alterado, y eso no se debía tocar.
王小明217abandonfrustrated這次改太多了,招牌文字不只是修字,連整個店內字樣都被改成 STIR & SIP,版面也跑掉了。雖然畫面算乾淨,但跟要求的「只改主招牌文字、其他都不動」差太遠。
Turn 5 Final pass — the image must look like the original coffee-shop photo with only the shop-name signage text changed.
1.90mean overall 1.10adherence 4.60artifact 0/9/1ship/send/abandon
LOWEST · 1/10 Oliver Martinez (abandon)
"The edit still violates the core constraint: the main sign has been changed to “STIR & SIP COFFEE CO.”, but the menu boards were also altered, and the interior no longer matches the seed exactly. The result is not acceptable for a final pass where only the sho"
HIGHEST · 2/10 王小明 (send_back)
"這次還是偏掉了,招牌不只是改文字,整個版面和字形結構都變了,還把 STIR COFFEE CO. 改成 STIR & SIP。雖然畫面算乾淨,但跟要求的『只改主招牌文字、其他都不動』差很多。"
See all 10 persona evaluations for this turn
PersonaOverallAdherenceArtifactVerdictEmotionComment
Oliver Martinez114abandonfrustratedThe edit still violates the core constraint: the main sign has been changed to “STIR & SIP COFFEE CO.”, but the menu boards were also altered, and the interior no longer matches the seed exactly. The result is not acceptable for a final pass where only the shop-name text should change.
Kevin Taylor214send_backfrustratedThe edit has drifted far beyond the requested text change: the sign branding, wall treatment, floor tone, and overall lighting all differ from the source. The café should look essentially identical to the seed with only the main shop-name text updated, and this is not close enough.
Sarah Johnson216send_backfrustratedThis drifted way too far from the original—too much got redesigned beyond just the shop name. The main sign text changed, but the branding, menu boards, floor, and overall vibe all shifted, so it doesn’t meet the preserve-everything-else requirement.
Mark Garcia225send_backfrustratedWay off on the edit — the shop name changed to "STIR & SIP COFFEE CO." and the whole scene drifted from the original. Too many other details got altered, so this misses the brief hard.
Emma Wilson215send_backfrustratedThe main sign text was changed, but the cafe environment was also altered substantially, which breaks the instruction to keep everything else unchanged. The result does not match the original coffee-shop photo closely enough for a final pass.
조서준214send_backfrustrated간판 문구 수정은 전혀 맞지 않고, ‘STIR COFFEE CO.’ 대신 ‘STIR & SIP COFFEE CO.’로 잘못 바뀌었습니다. 더 심각하게는 메뉴 보드, 조명, 벽면 톤, 바와 바닥 질감까지 원본과 다르게 변형되어 있어, 이번 지시는 충족되지 않았습니다.
杨涛215send_backfrustrated左侧店招被整体重做成了“STIR & SIP COFFEE CO.”,不仅文字目标错误,还把招牌图标、版式、菜单板和墙面关系都改坏了。当前结果偏离原咖啡店照片太多,不符合“只改店招文字,其余完全不变”的要求。
田中 彩213send_backfrustrated看板以外の要素まで大きく変わってしまっており、元の店内写真としての自然さが崩れています。しかも看板文言も「STIR & SIP COFFEE CO.」になっていて、指定どおりの厳密維持ができていません。
María López214send_backfrustratedNo está bien: cambió demasiado el interior y el rótulo principal sigue sin ser exactamente el original pedido. Además, los menús de la pared se han alterado, así que no cumple la instrucción de dejar todo lo demás intacto.
王小明216send_backfrustrated這次還是偏掉了,招牌不只是改文字,整個版面和字形結構都變了,還把 STIR COFFEE CO. 改成 STIR & SIP。雖然畫面算乾淨,但跟要求的『只改主招牌文字、其他都不動』差很多。

Persona Factor Analysis

per persona

Per-persona means + preference

PersonaLangExpertiseGPT meanNano meanΔPref
Oliver Martinezenexpert6.005.85+0.15GPT
Kevin Taylorenexpert6.506.05+0.45GPT
Sarah Johnsonennovice6.056.75-0.70Nano
Mark Garciaenintermediate6.556.10+0.45GPT
Emma Wilsonennovice6.406.75-0.35Nano
조서준koexpert6.505.70+0.80GPT
杨涛zhexpert5.755.90-0.15Nano
田中 彩janovice6.506.70-0.20Nano
María Lópezesintermediate6.606.00+0.60GPT
王小明zhnovice6.505.75+0.75GPT

Expense

A single flat price covers the full 8-session study — all image generation/edit calls, all 400 persona evaluations, all 400 memory updates, plus orchestration, parallelization, credit-ledger persistence, and this report.

$148.85
Total customer price
992
Billable credits
$0.15
Per credit
1093
Calls audited

Where the work went

calls
RoleN calls% of calls
image_gen20.2%
persona_evaluation52047.6%
memory_update52047.6%
image_edit514.7%

Pricing model

Customer price = (compute cost + platform fee) × market markup. 1 credit = $0.15. Derived at experiment level, not per-call.

What's Real vs. Not Claimed

What's real

What this is NOT